Talk:Mirapakay

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Indian This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. India: Andhra Pradesh / Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Mirapakaay → Mirapakaya — Correct title BOVINEBOY2008 10:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Mnost of the edit history is at Mirapakaya. The 08:40, 7 January 2011 edit of Mirapakaay and the 08:40, 7 January 2011 edit of Mirapakaya seem to be identical. History-merge is not suitable here because of WP:Parallel histories. The film's quoted Telugu language name మిరపకాయ్ transcribes as "mirapakāy", not "mirapakāya" or similar. I am tempted to merely copy-and-paste the 10:46, 8 January 2011 (= currently last) edit of Mirapakaay onto Mirapakaya, or to move Mirapakaya to Mirapakaay. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I think I actually disagree with my own request. The official website refers to it as Mirapakaay, even though there are some third-party sites referring to it as Mirapakaya, a la oneindia.in and nowrunning.com. I'm not sure, but it seems this is the "official" title, although this is always difficult with transliterations. BOVINEBOY2008 09:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So, how to most neatly close this without wasting time? Either spelling seems equally acceptable. Maybe just leave the messy edit history as is, noting that both histories are now possibly significant, and any cleanup will likely make things worse remembering that their most important function is to satisfy our copyleft obligations. Andrewa (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Administrator note Taken this out of the RM backlog as proposer has changed his mind anyway. Since histories won't be merged, users can decide through WP:BRD which version to go with. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 13:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Mirapakay Poster.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mirapakay Poster.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mirapakay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120116034823/http://www.telugucinema.com/c/publish/moviereviews/mirapakay_moviereview.php to http://www.telugucinema.com/c/publish/moviereviews/mirapakay_moviereview.php
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130219004442/http://www.chitramala.in/news/mirapakaya-movie-review-123959.html to http://www.chitramala.in/news/mirapakaya-movie-review-123959.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]