Talk:Megan Joy

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 March 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

Megan Joy received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pop music This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance). Television: Idols This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Idols task force. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Women in Music This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please do not remove this. I integrated this into the charts very successfully last season. (This applies to all of the Top 12 contenders.) It is factual information, in that it is an indisputable order in which the contestant performed on that particular night. And it is relevant to anyone doing a review or synopsis of the show who wants to analyze statistics and such. (Notice how all 3 who performed last on their respective nights made the Top 12.) It is an especially good record one they all perform on the same night. Thank you.--Cinemaniac86^Oy_gevalt. 16:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aspects and I continue to go around and around about the definition of "original artist." Aspects seems to think this should refer to the theme, while I think it makes more sense to refer to the actual original artist.

The song in question is Rockin' Robin by Bobby Day. While watching American Idol that night, I remarked to my wife, "I don't think that's a MJ original." Not being from the 60's, I had to look it up. Sure enough, it wasn't even the first mainstream cover of the song.

Bobby Day is the original artist, period. Especially considering there is a whole second column defining the theme of the week, what sense does it make to continue reverting to Michael Jackson as the original artist? -- puskarm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.7.52.17 (talk) 22:09, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since I only made the change once over two weeks ago, it is hard to say we will "continue to go around and around" when we have not started. As to your complaint, it does not make perfect sense to refer to the actual orginal artist because it does not fit the theme of the week. If the average Wikipedia reader read the page they would be confused as to why a Bobby Day song would be sung on a Michael Jackson themed week. The theme and the original artist do not have to be the same, see Jasmine Murray's page: she sang "I'll Be There" which is not a Michael Jackson song, but a Jackson 5 song but it still fits in the Michael Jackson theme. Per WP:BRD, I am changing the original artist back to Michael Jackson until there is a consensus reached that it should be changed since you started this talk after nearly two weeks of it being Michael Jackson (meaning that no one thought it was incorrect) and after making the reversion a couple of days ago. Aspects (talk) 18:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My position is simple. The "original artist" is Bobby Day, not Michael Jackson. Puskarm (talk) 15:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems pretty clear-cut that Bobby Day is the original artist and that MJ just did a cover/remake. I would not worry too much about the dissonance of another artist being listed under original artist under a themed week -- other American Idol pages do the same. Madcoverboy (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The opening lead should read "Megan Joy (born August 5, 1985), formerly known as Megan Joy Corkrey, is an American singer from Sandy, Utah who came in ninth place on the eighth season of American Idol.", not "Megan Joy Corkrey (born August 5, 1985) is an American singer from Sandy, Utah who came in ninth place on the [eighth season of American Idol."

The name of her article is Megan Joy, the infobox uses Megan Joy and all subsequent uses of her name in the article are Joy. The first version shows that she was once know as Megan Joy Corkrey. The second version makes it confusing why the Corkrey is there when Joy is used throughout the rest of the article. Aspects (talk) 01:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• No, it should read as it was and he subsequent uses of Joy should be changed to Corkrey. Tamajared (talk) 20:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just saying no is not trying to reach a consensus. Why do feel it should be changed to Corkrey? Aspects (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• In my opinion, she should always be refered to as Megan Joy unless she herself decides to become known publically as Megan Joy Corkrey once more. I think the mention that she was formally known as Megan Joy Corkey is sufficient enough mention of the Corkrey. :) (90.203.39.181 (talk) 19:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Megan Joy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090530161222/http://meganjoy.org:80/megan.html to http://www.meganjoy.org/megan.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Megan Joy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090529021550/http://blogs.usatoday.com/idolchatter/2009/03/megan-joy-dumps.html?csp=34%2F to http://blogs.usatoday.com/idolchatter/2009/03/megan-joy-dumps.html?csp=34%2F

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Megan Joy is currently married to Quinn Allman former band mate of The Used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:3026:4B6:4000:8569:8D90:E6A:71F6 (talk) 19:01, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]