Talk:Mario Party: The Top 100

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mario Party: The Top 100/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: The Green Star Collector (talk · contribs) 04:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 12:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will review this. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 12:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

• There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 32.9% in similarity.
• There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
• The article is stable.
• No previous GA reviews.

• Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
  • "gameplay in up to four characters" → "gameplay with up to four characters"
  • The rest of the article looks good, there are no grammatical errors.
• Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
  • Optional: Add alt text to images in the article.
  • The article complies with the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT], MOS:WTW, and MOS:WAF guidelines. There are no embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:EMBED. Overall, the lede's length is okay, and it summarises the article, the article has appropriate sections, and there are no biased words in the article.
• Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
  • References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article.
  • No referencing issues.
  • All references are reliable. Good job on archiving them.
  • Spotchecked Ref 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 17–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
    • The people in the infobox are unsourced.
    • Ref 5: no mentions of which eight characters, Toad for Minigame Island, Toadette for Championship Battles and Decathlon.
  • Copyvio already checked.
• Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
  • The article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
• Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
  • The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
• Checking whether the article is stable.
  • As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
• Checking images.
  • Images are properly licensed.

@The Green Star Collector: There's not too much to fix. Once the issues get addressed, I'll promote the article. The review will be put on hold for a week. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vacant0: Thank you for your feedback regarding the article. I've made the slight change to the lede and added citations from a subpage of an archived Nintendo website for the eight playable characters, as well as Toad and Toadette being hosts. (I also added a small amount of information in the "Development" section, concerning the game's release date in Europe being moved up two weeks.) As for citations for the staff listed in the infobox, I've found supporting information on both IMDb and Moby Games, though I'm aware that both websites are open-source and therefore likely unreliable. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, Mario Party: The Top 100 doesn't have a traditional manual that could be cited, which was the case for Mario Party DS. ★ The Green Star Collector ★ (talk) 02:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They’re mentioned in the game’s credits, which is ok. See https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oWP4YIB-1h0&pp=ygUgbWFyaW8gcGFydHkgdGhlIHRvcCAxMDAgY3JlZGl0cyA%3D 7:20. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 07:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 10:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]