Talk:Louis-René Villermé

Louis-René Villermé has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 9, 2017. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Louis-René Villermé appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 April 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Louis-René Villermé is considered a founder of social epidemiology for his work proving the association between poverty and mortality in early industrial France? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Louis René-Villermé.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Faithkbrown. Peer reviewers: Aeisenstadt1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, there are only three sentences that make up Villermé's biography. I would like to expand on this information as well as the information regarding his works (specifically On Prisons As They Are and As They Should Be). As of now, I have about 3 sound sources to help compile a more complete biography. Any suggestions for sources, topics to make sure to cover, or general information that should be included would be of extreme help as this talk page does not yet have very many, if any, current discussions. --Faithkbrown (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Faithkbrown (talk) 18:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is great! I love the in depth approach to Villermé's life! My one suggestion is to maybe double check that your sentences don't lead to conclusions about Villermé or his character. There seem to be some statements like "He is unique", etc. Anyway, this is really cool to read and you cover a nice chunk of information in a concise way!Aeisenstadt1 (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the positive feedback! I will review the sections that I wrote to double check any possible implications I may have made. Faithkbrown (talk) 22:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

>> Tableau de l'état physique et moral des ouvriers employés dans les manufactures de coton, de laine et de soie >> Why is it necessary to write 2 different paragraphs on the same subject (Tableau / Study) ?

I really enjoyed reading your article. You contributed quite substantially and your organization is clear and concise. I believe that adding more about Villerme's political affiliations and how this impacted his views on public health would be very effective in that it would allow the reader to understand his background a bit better. You covered it slightly at the end, although it would be great to expand on it. Perhaps you can draw on what we discussed in lecture?

Thanks!

Scarycheerio123 (talk) 03:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Scarycheerio123[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I have been looking into his political affiliations and have found it rather difficult to find information in English. If I do find out anymore, however, I will be sure to add. Faithkbrown (talk) 22:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Louis-René Villermé/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 06:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to take on this review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in general well written, well referenced and reasonably comprehensive. It meets most of the GA criteria and I have listed a few points below. It seems to be part of a student project and the nominator has not edited since 2 May and may have moved on to other things. It should be possible to bring this article to GA standard even if the nominator is unresponsive.

• The lead is rather short. It should not be necessary to have citations in the lead because the lead should be summarising content in the main body of text (where they should be cited), and should not include any facts not mentioned elsewhere.
• "This work served not only as valuable information to medical institutions and boards, but also as a widely received social statement by the public." - This sentence is difficult to understand, could you rephrase it.
  • That's all for now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• There has been no response to my brief review, so I have done some editing to the article with regard to the points I made, and I believe it now meets the GA criteria so I am passing it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]