Talk:Leeds Minster

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Yorkshire High‑importance Leeds Minster is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Mid-importance). Architecture High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Historic sites High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hi, the entry in further reading has a pages parameter of 244, I guess this is the number of pages in the book but there is no parameter in the template for the number of pages in a book. Parameter page is used for a single page the item appears on & pages for multiple pages. Keith D (talk) 18:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have started to copyedit this article on an important Leeds building. Reliable references required.--J3Mrs (talk) 10:44, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• "Leeds does not have an Anglican cathedral, but the minster has close links with the Roman Catholic Cathedral Church of St Anne in Leeds."

There are two ideas in this sentence. They both revolve around the word "cathedral". But what on earth is meant? Does this mean that since there is no Anglican cathedral, the Catholic cathedral is in charge of this church? A person who has no understanding of the roles of the Church of England and the Catholic Church in England is likely to think that this is what is meant. Can I suggest that you say something like: Since there is no Anglican Cathedral in Leeds, Leeds MInster plays a major role in manner A, manner B and manner C within the city. Don't mention that Catholic cathedral specifically, because it isn't relevant. This is about "ecumenical outreach" (or some words like that), not about "links" (which can mean a thousand things) with the Catholic cathedral.

• There is a statement about the church becoming a "minster". There needs to be a little more discussion of what this implies. Even a sentence like "At DATE the Church of England raised the church to the status of a minste" would help. Otherwise some of our readers are going to presume that the church suddenly became a monastic church, with a body of men or women in Holy Orders.
  • 1. In the lead, the word Minster is a blue link to Minster (church), so some of our readers can click it. Minster (church)#Late 20th and 21st century additions would be better, and I've altered the link.
  • 2. In the paragraph below the lead, the sentence "The parish church became Leeds Minster in a ceremony on Sunday 2 September 2012, the exact 171st anniversary of the 1841 consecration of the building[3][4]" seems perfectly OK.
  • --GuillaumeTell 18:02, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• More referencing is needed. This shouldn't be hard as I presume most of the info comes from several readily available sources.
• The window needs explanation. It is a very unusual and obviously heavily-restored window. You must put a rough date on it at the very least. Are there other windows in the church that are in the same style as that one, or are the others very different?
• Move the long list of priests down near the bottom. Long lists are a serious distraction.. The list of organists needs to be moved to a page of Church organists which hasn't been created yet. We are still working on the List of musicians at English cathedrals.

Amandajm (talk) 01:12, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Leeds Minster/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Substituted at 01:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Leeds Minster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140220111709/http://www.churchofengland.org/media/1915420/reorganisation%20scheme.pdf to http://www.churchofengland.org/media/1915420/reorganisation%20scheme.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927235327/http://www.lookingatbuildings.org.uk/default.asp?Document=3.G.4.4 to http://www.lookingatbuildings.org.uk/default.asp?Document=3.G.4.4
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000621133210/http://dnausers.d-n-a.net/leodis-leeds/cross.html to http://dnausers.d-n-a.net/leodis-leeds/cross.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]