Talk:LG15: The Last

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Endorse Speedy Keep, September 15, 2009, see DRV.
Speedy keep, September 13 2009, see discussion.
Do not merge into lonelygirl15, August 12 2009, see discussion.
Keep, August 3 2008, see discussion.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal LG15: The Last is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was do not merge into Lonelygirl15. -- Milowent (talk) 13:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article should now be merged with Lonelygirl15 as we still don't have any actual third-party non-trivial sources about 'The Last' show.

I respectuflly disagree. This option was just discussed in the AfD that just ended, and the result was keep. But I am going to work on substantive improvements of lg15 related articles now instead of engaging in these debates more. Cheers. --Milowent (talk) 20:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you are unable to find any third-party non-trivial sources about it then it fails WP:N so the relevant 'competition' information can be merged. If you don't think a merge is feasible with the current amount of sources then I guess it will have to be deleted.--Otterathome (talk) 21:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What about renegade's idea in the deletion discussion about a LG15 portal style page? Also, Otterathome the result was to keep the article, so just drop it about deleting the article. KindredPhantom (talk) 13:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to make a portal. I'll give you until next month to find more sources so it passes our guidelines, otherwise it will have to be merged or deleted, I don't mind which.--Otterathome (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geez, you are such a turdbucket, Otter. You write as if you are the sole owner of wikipedia. My understanding is that the result of the Lg15: The Last AfD was KEEP, despite these exact same arguments. --Milowent (talk) 19:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe that this article should be merged. It is, in itself, independent from that of LonelyGirl15. It was created by fans, for fans. --Gwenavere14 (talk)

With only one person in support of merge, and this proposal hanging out there for more than 3 weeks now, it appears appropriate to close this discussion at this time. --Milowent (talk) 13:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]