Talk:LET TG-10

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft / Gliding This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by the aircraft project. This article is supported by the gliding project.

I have photographs and lots of technical specifications for all of these aircraft... I'll upload them soon, when I get some more free time.

Merge with LET L-13 Blanik as it only a designation not the main aircraft type.Petebutt (talk) 03:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - it's not unprecedented for otherwise-identical military and civilian types to have seperate articles, and the Blanik's page is already at a reasonable length - merging this might make it WP:UNDUEly slanted torwards the TG-10. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently no consensus to merge this from more than a year ago, so I will remove the tags. - Ahunt (talk) 20:05, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think these are mergeable as the TG-10 label covers L-13/L-23/L-33. But Pete's underlying question remains unanswered: was the TG-10 really a "development" of the Czech aircraft or just an Americanised variant of it, e.g. re-instrumented?TSRL (talk) 21:11, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LET TG-10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324082626/http://www.koaa.com/news/af-academy-buys-19-new-gliders-for-cadet-training/ to http://www.koaa.com/news/af-academy-buys-19-new-gliders-for-cadet-training/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716224546/http://www.aetc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=7206 to http://www.aetc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=7206

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]