Talk:John Tzelepes Komnenos

John Tzelepes Komnenos has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 10, 2019. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance). Greece: Byzantine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force. Military history: Biography / Roman & Byzantine / Medieval / Early Muslim This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force Roman and Byzantine military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600) Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Turkey Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:John Tzelepes Komnenos/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 12:26, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• "was the son of the sebastokrator Isaac Komnenos" Optional but recommended: could we have a bracketed translation/explanation of "sebastokrator". Also at first mention under "Life".

Actually, I don't think that the first sentence does what it is supposed to for a reader. Maybe something like 'was a scion of the Byzantine imperial royal family and the son of the sebastokrator Isaac Komnenos'?

• You are right, the title by itself is not enough; added his grandfather to make the context clear. Sebastokrator does not really have an explanation, it is an honorific without actual meaning (there is a literal translation, "revered ruler" or something like that, but that does not help the reader much).

• This may be one of those areas that thee and me disagree on, but I am not happy with including phraseology which we both agree a reader will not understand. It is not a deal breaker at GAN, but if it were me I would write something like 'was the son of the Isaac Komnenos, nephew of Byzantine emperor John II Komnenos and grandson of emperor Alexios I Komnenos.' I think that a reader would assume appropriate fancy titles in the appropriate language; or you could footnote it.

• Hmmm, well, the title is important; it would be like neglecting to mention that Prince Harry is a prince. I don't think it should matter whether it is well known or not, that is the purpose of reading an encyclopedia and providing a link to it after all ;).

• Your point of view is entirely reasonable, and the fact that I have a different preference doesn't prevent me from seeing that. As I said, it is not a deal breaker at GAN. I wanted you to have a relook at how it was worded; you have and are happy. Fair enough.

• "his uncle, Emperor John II Komnenos" -> 'his uncle, Byzantine Emperor John II Komnenos'?

• Now I've added Alexios I earlier, it should be clear.

• "a younger son of Emperor Alexios I Komnenos" -> 'a younger son of the Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenos'?

• Fixed.

• "set his sight" -> 'set his sights'.

• Fixed.

• "pointed his arms to the rear" Genuine question, what does this mean?

• Yes, that is awkward. It is supposed to mean that he shouldered his lance or something like that (in modern terms, slung back his rifle). The primary account literally says "he tied his arms [poiting] to the back". I don't know how to write this better.

• I would suggest deleting it; it seems trivial information and as it stands is more likely to confuse than inform a reader.

• Fair enough, especially if it confuses even me trying to write about it...

• "received by Mehmed, who knew him from his previous exile, and readily divulged the information he was privy to" This sounds as if Mehmed is divulging the information.

• Fixed.

• "this act saved Neocaesarea from falling, as the emperor was left with no choice but to withdraw." This seems a bit vague and hand wavey. Is there any more information?

• Added some details about these weaknesses, and a "probably" to the "saved Neocaesarea".

• That's better, IMO. I have made three small changes. Feel free to revert if you don't like them.

• They look good, thanks.

• "He received many lands and wealth" -> 'He received many lands and much wealth'.

• Fixed.

Hi Constantine. That is all for a first run through. I will have another look in a couple of days. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:26, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Gog the Mild, thanks for taking the time. I've answered/fixed a sbest I could. Looking forward to your follow-up. Constantine ✍ 09:06, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Just a couple of things for your consideration.

Gog the Mild (talk) 14:48, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again Gog the Mild, please have another look. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 08:53, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Another article which it is a joy to assess. Well up to GA and I am happy to so promote it. Gog the Mild (talk) 09:26, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The whole article is disinformation. Seljuqs and Byzantine had no ties to Ottoman empire during ertugrul 88.226.230.194 (talk) 18:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]