[go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

Talk:Incheon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Jinsen" name

[edit]

'called Jinsen by the Japanese colonists' why is that so imporant to mention about how Japanese colonists called that city? Wikipedia is not Japanese encyclopedia written in English -- Taku 22:43 Jan 6, 2003 (UTC)

I disagree with you Taku. The article is about a place. When a place is colonized, that becomes a significant part of the history of that place, therefore, what the colonists called the place becomes pertinent. --Qaz

I agree with Taku. Jinsen is irrelavant to this page. soax 20:09 Jan 14, 2003 (UTC)

It is important! Jinsen = Incheon (during the Japanese rule), Historical name. Böri (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the name Jinsen does not need to be mentioned. Other historical names, including Jaemulpo, have existed, and mentioning Jinsen is not neccessary unless those names are all to be mentioned. Actually I've never heard of the name Jinsen as a Incheon citizen born and raised here, when other historical names are frequently mentioned by seniors. --Hongmt (talk) 21:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree vehemently. The point of an encyclopedia is to provide relevant, encyclopedic (historical and other) information – especially when is not universally known: you are here to learn new encyclopedic facts, after all, not only "common knowledge"! –, not to omit or suppress it out of concerns that it might be politically sensitive; that is comparable to historical revisionism, textbook (self-)censorship or whitewashing – the omission of vital information from textbooks for political reasons. As a former official name of the city (and possibly former or still-used exonym), Jinsen is inherently notable and 100% encyclopedic. It's the same as with German exonyms of Polish cities (which used to be the official names during the Nazi period) – for Warsaw not to mention the German exonym Warschau and for Oświęcim not to mention (prominently, even) Auschwitz just because of its associations with Nazi rule would amount to historical revisionism or (self-)censorship. The foreign name is an essential part of the history of the city, like it or not. That a nation or some other group of people was a victim is a conflict or brutally colonised doesn't give them the right to expunge facts related to that event or period from encyclopedias to avoid being reminded of that period in history, no more than to the formerly dominating, ruling, victorious, or colonising party. I have inserted the historical names now – in bold – because they redirect here. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 08:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2nd

[edit]

If Incheon really does have 5.45 mil, how come Busan (with 3.7) is the 2nd largest city in S Korea?

Short answer: It doesn't. I can't figure out where the "5.45 million" figure came from, but all sources I can find give a population of about 3 million less than that (whether it is now the third-largest city in South Korea is a more open question). I've replaced the previous number with one from the KNSO's online 2000 census figures. -- Visviva 14:06, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)


The Movie

[edit]

What about the movie called Incheon? Should this be mentioned here, and maybe on a separate page? Mathmo

Modern Incheon

[edit]

I remember Inchon well. Having spent more than a year there (1953-1954) as a member of the US Army Signal Corps restoring communications destroyed by the conflict. The city I see via the internet today is one I would never have expected to arise from the rubble that I remember from a half century ago.

Question: When was the E added to the name Inchon? Incheon?

Hope to be around to visit when your new 200 story super skyscraper is complete.

John Putnam Newton, NH

It depends on which way you romanize the word. Romanization Kbarends 06:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the Revised Romanization of Korean replaced the McCune-Reischauer romanization about the year 2000. The McCune-Reischauer system was adopted in 1937, so it is what you are probably used to. Davidinkorea 01:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inju=?

[edit]

Hi there. I have a question regarding Incheon’s medieval name; some sources hold it that the city was called Inju, while others identify Inju with Kyongwon (Saebyol). Can anyone clarify this? Thanks, KoberTalk 18:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name Change

[edit]

It seems that there should some reference to a name change from Inchon to Incheon, initiated to comply with a recently adopted romanisation system for Korean words. I believe the change was introduced by the Korean government in 2001. At the same time, the Invasion of Inchon should remain the provious spelling for two reasons. First it was the spellig that wa prevalent at the time and second, the victor routinely gets to choose the name fo the battle.72.242.134.135 (talk) 17:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Night view of New Songdo City, Incheon, South Korea.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Night view of New Songdo City, Incheon, South Korea.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:52, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Incheon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Incheon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Incheon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfinished thought

[edit]

The second sentence of the second paragraph within Major events begins, “Until, Incheon was the site of the Battle of Inchon, ...” I am not sure what the author is trying to say. Until what?

 R/ the JMOprof ©¿©¬ 15:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Incheon&oldid=1212050541"