Talk:Humulene

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemicals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is the BP quoted as 106C at 5mm of Hg? Why not at STP? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.213.61.35 (talk) 03:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the introduction the word terpenoid should be deleted after "doubly substituted" (and a space added before "consisting"). In the biosynthesis diagram why are there arrows labelled b and why are there arrows in humulene? Why do references 7, 13, & 15 state "missing or empty"? 69.72.92.230 (talk) 02:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the bad grammar in the intro, removed the diagram which is problematic in several ways, and found the missing reference titles. Thanks for catching and reporting the problems, but in the future you should feel free to fix these kinds of errors yourself. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to this scientific study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206475/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.242.105.214 (talk) 23:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Humulene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131230232825/http://www.asbcnet.org/journal/abstracts/backissues/39-39.htm to http://www.asbcnet.org/journal/abstracts/backissues/39-39.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]