Talk:Hogarth Roundabout

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Highways: United Kingdom Stub‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. London Transport Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It would be nice to add a summary of the relatively recent creation of this roundabout and the new road system, which has so devastated Old Chiswick and Hammersmith. The article on the A4 also omits this topic. I fear that if I wrote it it would violate the POV rules. I will try to find a factual reference though. Davidnugget (talk) 23:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there's certainly no place for editorial opinions here, nor for selective use of opposition statements. But a cited description of the changes would be of value. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hogarth Roundabout. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160820084645/http://www.cbrd.co.uk/articles/ringways/ to http://www.cbrd.co.uk/articles/ringways/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]