Talk:Hawker Siddeley HS 748

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project.

The first paragraph describes the 748 as "small" and "short range". When I read those words I don't immediately conjure an image of an aircraft with a 100' wingspan and a MTOW of 21,000kg with the capabililty of flying 1,700km at that weight (specs from wikipedia). I suggest these words be removed - any thoughts? It also says "was" when it is still in service. Does anyone agree that this paragraph needs a clean-up? --58.165.64.100 18:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i saw your interest on the AVRO 748 and had to ask if you have any clue on how to get the 'instruction manual ' of that plane. It's meant to be a gift to somebody that flew it. By the way i totally agree to your comments about the article.

thanks! eleoth----

Portugal SATA - Serviço Açoriano de Transportes Aéreos LAR - Linhas Aéreas Regionais

Cape Verde TACV - Transportes Aéreos de Cabo Verde

Jfsafonso (talk) 10:25, 4 June 2013 (UTC) J. Afonso[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hawker Siddeley HS 748. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121015060558/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/1971/Dec09/index.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/1971/Dec09/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:38, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hawker Siddeley HS 748. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130729140557/http://www.hwh22.it/xit/S02_documenti/doc_aercrash.html to http://www.hwh22.it/xit/S02_documenti/doc_aercrash.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130118044908/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=19766 to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=19766

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Still operating? The 748 is not in the list of current operational aircraft on that Air Force’s wiki page. Boscaswell talk 10:14, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand they have all been withdrawn from use and parked up. MilborneOne (talk) 12:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Air had to operate out of the reinstated wartime airfield at Scatsta near Sullom Voe Oil base. It was short and narrow. They fitted former srs2 engines into lightweight srs1 airframes. This extra power allowed the carriage of a full load of 44 passengers on the 2hr trip to Glasgow. If I remember correctly the registrations involved were G-ARRW , G-ARMX , G-ARMW, and G-BEKG. 82.45.72.138 (talk) 13:46, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]