Talk:H&E stain

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Pathology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Pathology task force (assessed as High-importance). Anatomy: Microanatomy Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been classified as relating to microanatomy.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on H&E stain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070926215514/http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/img/assets/7361/Primer-H&Emay04.pdf to http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/img/assets/7361/Primer-H&Emay04.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110607215410/http://www.bcm.edu/mcb/rosenlab/index.cfm?pmid=12983 to http://www.bcm.edu/mcb/rosenlab/index.cfm?pmid=12983

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't imagine that this subject sees significant changes from decade to decade, but as a general rule, we do try to minimize the use of sources that are more than about 10 years old when writing about medicine-related subjects. The point is to keep things up to date, so if the article is actually up to date while citing sources that are nearly 40 years old, then that's okay. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]