Talk:Greenwood & Batley

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK / Locomotives Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Locomotives task force. Yorkshire Low‑importance Greenwood & Batley is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles Greenbat and Greenwood and Batley also exist and all three link to one another through 'See also' links. This is the most complete article, and the correct name for the company. I am proposing that all three articles should be merged into this one.

Note - there is scope for keeping 'Greenbat' as a sub-article about the company's railway loco business, but initially I would propose a single-article solution.

EdJogg (talk) 14:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have amalgamated all three now but the article will need editing by a loco enthusiastPetebutt (talk) 14:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for running with this. I have fixed the referencing errors and checked the merge from Greenwood and Batley, but got side-tracked into creating an article sub-section for Battery-electric locomotives.

Will continue another day... EdJogg (talk) 00:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Greenwood & Batley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080821080828/http://www.pogo.org.uk/railway/gandbtr.html to http://www.pogo.org.uk/railway/gandbtr.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080731185352/http://www.djr12ecg.demon.co.uk:80/wllr/locos2.html to http://www.djr12ecg.demon.co.uk/wllr/locos2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Greenwood & Batley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717122855/http://www.ribblesteam.org.uk/stocklist/greenbat.htm to http://www.ribblesteam.org.uk/stocklist/greenbat.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813222720/http://www.embsayboltonabbeyrailway.org.uk/gandbtr.html to http://www.embsayboltonabbeyrailway.org.uk/gandbtr.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717122855/http://www.ribblesteam.org.uk/stocklist/greenbat.htm to http://www.ribblesteam.org.uk/stocklist/greenbat.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]