[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Green Lantern (comic book)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge?

[edit]

I'm just curious - why do we need two Green Lantern articles, i.e., this one and Green Lantern? What void does this article fill that the main Green Lantern article was not covering? I realize that we have done this for other subjects, cf. Superman and Superman (comic book), Batman and Batman (comic book). However, I question whether it is necessary in this case. That said, I'm not looking to start any fights. :-) --GentlemanGhost (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would assume that it is the same reason we now have The Flash (comic book) and Flash (comics).
It really may be worthwhile to fold the actual comic book information, not the in story/plot summary stuff, that is needed into the base articles and see if they are large enough to justify splitting these off. - J Greb (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is a more general discussion here. (Emperor (talk) 02:40, 19 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Test

[edit]

Test — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.69.106.171 (talk) 06:47, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly

[edit]

The article states "He killed countless Green Lanterns in his rampage through the universe to Oa, seemingly killed his arch enemy Sinestro, killed the Guardians and took the power of Oa's Central Power Battery for himself." Why is everything else written factually, but he SEEMINGLY killed Sinestro? If this is supposed to be encyclopedic and not an in universe fan page, then in that story he did kill sinestro and in the volume 4 section, it was retconned that he didn't.129.139.1.68 (talk) 18:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Green Lantern (comic book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]