Talk:Fuel tank

Ship in a Bottle fuel tank was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 April 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Fuel tank. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. Automobiles Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Packaging This article is within the scope of WikiProject Packaging, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of containers, packaging, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PackagingWikipedia:WikiProject PackagingTemplate:WikiProject PackagingContainers articles

The small section on aircraft fuel tanks was written as a casual response to an inquiry on wet wings. It wasn't really suitable for an article as it was addressing another person, using words like "your" and "you", etc. Perhaps he would do us the favor of rewriting it like he suggested. Mexcellent 10:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I know the style could be improved, which I have done a little now, but it was better than nothing.--Patrick 22:54, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote it to be more complete, including tanks other than just the two he mentioned. Mexcellent 13:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Someone wrote:

A rise in fuel theft has been linked to the rise in fuel prices in countries all over the globe, in particular Australia and Germany. (Sources: ABC7 News and SMH.com.au)

More is now required from fuel tanks, especially on large trucks which carry large amounts and are often parked in unsecure locations whilst out on jobs. There are many after sales accessories available on the market to protect fuel tanks including fuel monitoring sensors and anti-syphon devices. An example of which can be seen at: www.syphon-sound.co.uk

For Syphoning see: [1]

1. Although I hear much complains about fuel price, I haven't heard much, if anything, about fuel theft in Germany.
2. The first link is a software producer, not saying anything about the topic.
3. The second link is a producer of devices to protect ageinst fuel theft.

--Ikar.us 16:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The picture is for the storage of fule, not part of a car. Should this be two articles? How about one for "gas tank" that would describe things like standards, average size, saftey etc.

I'm seeing stuff like "Reserve tank Sometimes called the reserve tank, a light on the instrument panel of autos typically illuminates when the fuel level dips below a certain point in the tank. There is no current standard, although some efforts are made to collect this data for all automobiles.". I dunno about you guys, but that sounds more like a "LOW FUEL" light to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.71.168 (talk) 06:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There is also a lot of crosstalk in the article - ex: "Safe (UL Approved)fuel storage, there is some concern that UL (Underwriters Laboratories) is not the final arbitor of safety." And the summary is far too large. For a stub that's fine, but this article is clearly beyond the stage where all the content can be crammed into the summary. SaSSafraS LTK (talk) 17:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Fuel reserve

The motion of such vehicles causes the diesl to foam. I remember an early van that stank to high heaven because it foamed through the pressure releae cap and worked its along the chassis frame. Later tank were fitted with internal baffles to limit the movement, 92.11.224.162 (talk) 09:47, 5 August 2008 (UTC)TE[reply]

I think this was a poor decision, and that this type of fuel cell deserves it's own article. Fuel cells are a hugely important for the safety of modern race cars, and there a great many types and technologies that go into them. I think the fact that the article was a stub does not indicate that there's not enough info about the subject, but simply that it wasn't yet in wikipedia. I'll try and write an article and get it set up fairly soon. On a different note, I don't think racing fuel cell is necessarily the best title, as some road cars use them as well. (admittedly, very few). How about Fuel cell (fuel tank)? ce1984 (talk) 23:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What if someone shoots a gas tank? Does that mean It'll explode? A tried adding it but it got deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzzyhair2 (talk • contribs) 22:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I were Merecedes, I might have an issue with the photo as it is presented. Many fuel tanks have been located behind the rear axle without issue. I suggest a more generic photo be substituted, or support data be referenced. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 12:17, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Ford's Pinto also sparked controversy for putting the fuel tank"

"Sparked"? Seriously? Skaizun (talk) 01:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What about the fuel tanks on diesel electric locomotives? Peter Horn User talk 21:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article discusses two technologies used to make automotive fuel tanks and states that one shows its capacity to obtain very low emissions of fuel, while the other is very good in limiting fuel emissions. On first reading I thought this referred to exhaust gas emissions, but that didn't make sense, so now I suppose that by "fuel emissions" is meant: emission of gas by evaporation – a possibility not listed on the dab page Emission, although we have a redirect page Evaporative emission. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable about fuel tank technologies can clarify this in the article.  --Lambiam 00:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fuel tank. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130401112046/http://www.rolanddarby.com/br_sidesaddle.html to http://www.rolanddarby.com/br_sidesaddle.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927201407/http://www.sfwmd.gov/ce/CERP-Design-Manuals/SE544A~1.PDF to http://www.sfwmd.gov/ce/CERP-Design-Manuals/SE544A~1.PDF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]