Talk:French cruiser Coëtlogon

	French cruiser Coëtlogon has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	French cruiser Coëtlogon is part of the Protected cruisers of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 31, 2020 Good article nominee Listed October 19, 2021 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Maritime / European / French This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force European military history task force French military history task force

This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Coëtlogon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 00:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Claim. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Body and lead

• Can we expand the lead just a little bit like where she did her trails and operating?
  • I don't know where she did her trials
• the earlier unprotected cruiser Milan I'd think we better can add French here because I believe some people can be confused to Milan and think she was an Italian ship (because Milan is in Italy)?
  • Is that really necessary? We're talking about French cruisers, isn't the context clear?
• The unprotected cruiser Milan was Same as above.
• Link ardent supporter.
  • To what?

• Is there no link or so?

• To "ardent supporter"? No, that doesn't have any specific meaning beyond what the words themselves mean

• No link for some of the guns?
  • We don't have an article for them
• which was kept in commission for only four months per year If this commission lasted only four months a year what happened with her in the rest of the year?
  • They were decommissioned, but I don't know when they entered and left service
• By January 1901, Coëtlogon and both of her sister ships --> "By January 1901, she and both of her sister ships"
  • Done
• about 2,000 long tons (2,032 t) displacement Normal or full load same in the infobox.
  • Conway's doesn't say, unfortunately

Infobox

• The tons don't match with the body.
  • Yeah they do - you're looking at the wrong number in the body - check the second paragraph

Images

• "File:Forbin-Poyet.jpg" is there a tag which states it's in the public domain over the whole world?
  • I'm not sure what you're asking; almost all countries use some form of year PMA to determine copyright, so all of them that are 100 years or less are fine per the template. But I've added a US tag as well
• Also just a question here is, do the NHHC's tags only speak for the US's domain?
  • Yes

Sources

• Barry's OCLC doesn't say Washington D.C. but only Washington however this can be confused with the state Washington. Do you know a source or so which states it's made in D.C.? Same with Dorn, E. J. & Drake, J. C.
  • If you look at the source itself, yes, it says D.C.
• Both Brassey's 1895s should have their letters like the citations say.
  • Done
• All Brasseys have the same OCLC?
  • Yes, since it's a periodical
• Gardiner's link uses the location: New York instead of London?
  • London is correct for the first edition that I'm using - this is the entry you're looking for
• Are months really needed here? Except maybe both Brassey's 1895s should have a month or a letter to separate them.
  • Yes, those are monthly periodicals so the month is required. Brassey's was an annual; there's no month

That's it from me I think. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CPA-5: - anything left to address? Parsecboy (talk) 19:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey Nate sorry for letting you wait for some time. I lost the ambition of Wikipedia and hadn't really time to reply (I had just started again with work and school —exams are coming too–. After a quick review, I think we should add years if possible in the image "File:French_cruiser_Coëtlogon_NH_66063.jpg" before I could pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 18:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @CPA-5: - no problem, things do come up. I don't have any years to add to the photos, unfortunately - I could say "date unknown", but I don't know if that really adds any information of value. Parsecboy (talk) 20:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• A pretty small article but it does meet the GA requirements; there is no reason to hold it back. Nice work as always. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 06:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]