Talk:Fit model

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is relatively new and as something of a neologism, the phrase "fit model" page needs sources. Have reverted the recent edit of references (albeit not permalinks, my apologies) as WP:ED guidelines are not definitive; editing without prior discussion may be viewed as subjective. AntiVanity (talk) 09:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "fitting model" does seem to be the more established term. I've changed the article name accordingly. -- The Anome (talk) 04:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having been a "fit model" myself in the past I'd beg to differ. Indeed the changed title is without references to support the change whereas the usual term is easily referenced (and used to be). --AlisonW (talk) 13:02, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any citations for the term fitting model? I think we should change page name back. - phi (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...and my search for refs turned up so many I changed it back now. I guess the 'logism' is no longer so 'neo' and hope consensus approves. - phi (talk) 19:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About that model mentioned at the end - where did they find a guy half as tall as the Eiffel Tower? Also I doubt someone that tall only weighs 180 Tons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.219.37.232 (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]