[go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

Talk:Essendon Football Club

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I've moved the honours section to Essendon Football Club honours because this article was getting too long with it. Perhaps the Brownlow winners, team of the century, and champions list should also go there? TPK 13:31, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

[edit]

Little short on photos, maybe some of the Premiership teams or even Sheedy.

James Hird Brownlow medal

[edit]

james Hird didn't win the brownlow in '96, he won it in 1995 as a dual winner with Michael Voss.

No he certainly did not, Paul Kelly won in 1995. James Hird and Michael Voss won jointly in 1996. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.253.13.42 (talk) 14:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matty Lloyd Team of Century

[edit]

If the team of the century was named in 1997 then I don't see how Lloyd could be in it... prior to that year he had played a total of 16 games for 25 goals! Essendon really must have struggled for quality forward pockets over the years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferrel81 (talk • contribs) 11:02, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

—I'm quite sure that it was in 96 that Voss and Hird got the brownlow...in 95 it was Paul Kelly who won it.BrotherEstapol 15:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV explanation?

[edit]

I don't understand why this tag is there, shouldn't whoever placed it there have a discussion on the talk page? Kinser 23:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't put the tag there but gee - this is about the most obvious case I have ever seen of NPOV violation on Wikipedia. Most of this article is written as a commentary on various matters, which is strictly forbidden on this site. We are not allowed to write anything that expresses the editor's opinion or is biased or demonstrates any point of view. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an editorial. Please read WP:NPOV if you do not understand this policy. Remy B 02:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the section "The Dick Reynolds years (1939 - 1960)", I think there needs to be clear evidence to support the assertion that EFC were asking their players to join the Fire Brigade more than any other club. Also, the comment that "Evidence of this can be seen in Essendon's descent of the ladder towards the end of the War, and during the period immediately afterwards", seems incorrect as Essendon were premiers in 1946, came 2nd in 1947/1948 and won back to back premierships in 1949/1950. Woftram (talk) 01:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to clean up the POV and emotional contributions, so that it will read a little more like an encyclopedic article. Unfortunately, with the commentary and writing style, this means removing very large parts of the article...Wikipeterproject (talk) 21:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Needs further refrencing. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 22:16, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VFL/AFL Premierships

[edit]

The list of VFL/AFL premierships has 17 entries, surely there should only be 16

Ahh yes, why is 2008 been listed as seasons won? its clearly obvious that they have not....Yet, and nobody can fight with that.--Deathtopplintheir40s 15:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Club Guernsey/Jersey/Kit/Uniform

[edit]

Removed: "Essendon has worn this design, unchanged, giving the AFL, and indeed Essendon a unique record in world sport as it's the longest period that any sporting club in the world has worn the same primary guernsey design. This now has been recognised in the Guinness Book of World Records."

Aside from being uncited, this is patently false. I am personally familiar with several English and Scottish Association Football clubs whose kits have been in use since 1890 or earlier (Heart of Midlothian FC, Notts County, Blackburn, etc - I'm sure there are many more in Britain and around Europe). Queen's Park have been wearing the same kit since 1873. This is a fascinating website: http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/ - Ledenierhomme 06:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No they haven't - uncited speculation in the article notwithstading, Essendon have only ever worn black with a red sash to any game. The abovementioned British clubs have long worn away kits with different colours and designs. Even if this is the case, Essendon was founded in 1871, and played their first game in 1873 - and according to essendonfc.com.au, this was in "black with a red sash". Therefore it is not "patently false" at all. 124.190.83.11 11:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but Essendon are the one AFL team or really the only team in Australia that has worn the same uniform since they began. --Deathtopplintheir40s 15:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:124.190.83.11|124.190.83.11, I think you need to read the article again: "To avoid clashing with other teams, Essendon adopted a Red sash in 1875, and is recorded in magazines of the day as wearing Blue with Red sash up until about 1889. At this time, uniforms were ordered in the club colours, Black with a Red sash, and in every game from 1890 to today." So, that's 1890 onwards. As I said, several English and Scottish Association Football clubs have jersey designs that have been in use since previous to 1890. Ledenierhomme 17:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the Bombers are serious about promoting the game in Japan ...

[edit]

Then someone should start by translating this article into Japanese ... --Rulesfan 05:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Football League, AUSTRALIAN! we speak english, not japanese! Dont you agree that more people are going to want to read it in english then japanese, because you know, they are not from japan therefor more Aussies are gonna want to read that page.--Deathtopplintheir40s 15:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deathtopplintheir40s, there is a japanese version of wikipedia - www.ja.wikipedia.org. Calm down and open your mind. Comes.amanuensis (talk) 14:09, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Essendon-2007 Home.gif

[edit]

Image:Essendon-2007 Home.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Essendon-2007-Clash.gif

[edit]

Image:Essendon-2007-Clash.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:2006 AFL Essendon.jpg

[edit]

Image:2006 AFL Essendon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Essendon80s.png

[edit]

Image:Essendon80s.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional supporter?

[edit]

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but is it really relevant that a "fictional character from Neighbours" supports the Bombers?

It's one of the most stupid things I have read in my browsing of Wikipedia, and believe me, I've read some pretty ridiculous things! Who wrote it, anyway? A teenage girl? It should be gotten rid of. 122.49.152.148 (talk) 15:54, December 13, 2008

Teenage girls, like everyone else, are free to contribute to Wikipedia! Best to assume good faith and make corrections to edits as you see fit, without being to quick to label someone else's edit "stupid". That's called assuming good faith! Wikipeterproject (talk) 06:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wiped the whole bit. Prime target for POV. Aaroncrick (talk) 06:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Blood Stained

[edit]

There is no evidence online of the club ever have been called The Blood Stained Blacks. There is evidence of the nickname The Blood Stained Niggers, for example here. For obvious reasons, this nickname isn't in use any more, so shouldn't be listed in the infobox as a nickname. It might be possible, if someone is thus inclined, to discuss this elsewhere in the article. Wikipeterproject (talk) 06:23, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Causes section

[edit]

Part of my reasoning for this section is to reflect the fact that the club is involved with a charitable cause beyond just sport. It seems reasonable to presume that such activity by people like Watson is undertaken due to a pride underpinning their decision to become involved. I also think it is important that figures like these are perceived and understood as multi-dimensional people who are not just "celebrities". I am aware that original research is disallowed on Wikipedia, for good reason, but if both the club and its management were asked about this matter, I would be incredibly surprised if a decision is made to omit such information. Of course, I do not expect to expand this section beyond what currently exists, but I certainly think that it is worth mentioning (in the same way that other celebrities have been recognized for their charity work). Furthermore, I do not own a dog or support the campaign in any way.--Soulparadox (talk) 04:11, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Early history

[edit]

I dispute the following referenced paragraph from the Jim Main source:

"By 1876, according to Jim Main, Essendon was deemed to be 'one of the most powerful' Australian rules clubs in colonial Victoria. This enabled it to become one of the inaugural members of the Victorian Football Association (VFA) in 1877.[7] Rule uniformity in this new competition could initially be said to have been experimental. 'Senior' clubs were allowed twenty-five players, whereas 'junior' clubs twenty players; but oddly, Essendon, despite being regarded as a 'senior' club used twenty-five players in a match against Melbourne. Essendon finished their first year in the VFA playing 19 games for eight wins and a finish in fourth place.[8]"

Two issues: firstly, contemporary sources I've seen make it clear that Essendon was a junior club up to 1877. This article from the Australasian states that the club was junior in 1877: Football junior&searchLimits=l-title=460|||l-decade=187 – and this one that the club decided to become senior at its AGM in 1878 Football senior&searchLimits=l-title=460|||l-decade=187|||l-year=1878.

Secondly, the statement that Essendon was "one of the most powerful" clubs in colonial Victoria in 1876 is too vague. This cannot refer to on-field prowess as the club was junior at the time; if it relates to off-field position, finances, etc., that's fine, but I think that basis needs to be specified.

In my experience, modern references do a very poor job of describing pre-VFL football history accurately. I'm strongly inclined to entirely ignore the Jim Main source and go with the contemporary sources on this matter, because the contemporary sources state these points so explicitly. Aspirex (talk) 08:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes. Sounds fine. Would you be able to go ahead changing that bit, as you obviously know more than myself. Perhaps I can put the alternative view as published by the club itself in the notes section. Specifics aren't mentioned, bar the contradiction that supposedly Eseednon was given 'junior' privlidges in the 1877 match against Melbourne despite Main saying no it was deemed a senior club. I presume it fielded 20 players in other games? Aaroncrick TALK 12:25, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It definitely fielded 25 against Carlton as well. I think it fielded 20 against other junior clubs – West Melbourne and the like – but I'd have to look in closer detail. Aspirex (talk) 07:49, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on Essendon Football Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How did an F-111 get on the current badge ?

[edit]

Article states the nickname "bombers" came from proximity to Essendon Aerodrome. But how and when did what looks like an F-111 get onto the current badge ? Did they actually fly there ? I think the article should explain the badge. Rcbutcher (talk) 16:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are many issues throughout this article, can someone who knows more about Wikipedia mark this article as one that needs changes?

[edit]

Thanks 106.70.162.247 (talk) 00:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As with most articles, this one is open for anyone to edit. Feel free to give it a go yourself. Otherwise, please list what parts of the article you believe are problematic. HiLo48 (talk) 01:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Australia entered WWII in 1939, with considerable human and hardware resources sent to Europe and Africa – see Military history of Australia during World War II. Have now cleaned up the nonsense in this article stating that Australia did not go to war until 1942, originally written as “1941 brought Essendon's first grand final appearance since 1923… A year later war broke out and the competition was considerably weakened…” further stating that, until 1942, rationing had not yet started, expanded military training had not yet started, and no players had yet entered military service. The cleanup done just now likely needs more attention/correction, but the text is no longer written to imply that Australia was doing nothing for first two-and-a-quarter years of WWII. Jmg38 (talk) 11:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Essendon_Football_Club&oldid=1254934106"