Talk:English phonology

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Linguistics: Phonetics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force. English Language Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archives (Index)

1 2 3 4

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

In this section it lists /vl/ as an onset that only occurs in loanwords (with Vladimir as the example) but it exists in the very English word vlog, with it being the base for vlogs, vlogged, vlogging and vlogger. What do you think about moving it someplace else? The cool numel (talk) 21:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a recent coinage, so it's considered marginal. Nardog (talk) 20:56, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The table lists /sfr/, /smj/, /gw, /pw/, /θl/, /vw/ all as onsets even tho as far as I can tell they all occur in very very few words. /vw/ occurs only in an interjection (voila) and /gw/ only occurs in a proper noun (Guam). Isn't vlog just as marginal as sphragisitcs? The cool numel (talk) 14:50, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some of this was discussed back in 2009: Talk:English phonology/Archive 3#Loanwords. How natural they are depend on how common those specialised words are in your vocabulary: I have a /fθ/ for phthalate, but I didn't remember (or maybe even know) the word thlipsis before looking this page up. Having said that, I do think /vl/ is basically native by now: "vlog" has been around for over a decade. And maybe we should use other examples for initial /gw/ like guava or guano.

P.S. there's also very very few words ending /ln/; it's just that it occurs in one familiar example. So rarity is not by itself an argument. Double sharp (talk) 04:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, the vowel phoneme tables show RP as having central vowels for GOOSE, FOOT and a back vowel for START, but GA as having back vowels for GOOSE, FOOT and a central vowel for START. I question whether this is a real distinction: while the position of START in American English varies, I think the Northern Cities Vowel Shift is generally not considered to be default "General American". Would a front vs. non-front setup work better? I also am not sure ɑ ɜ ɔ fit well into the lax/tense binary, given that ɑ functions as the lax counterpart of oʊ in the context of correspondences like "trisyllabic laxing". Does anyone else agree that the GA table should be revised? Urszag (talk) 17:36, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added the glottal stop /ʔ/ to the chart, but I also added /x/ to the chart in this article. While the glottal stop /ʔ/ and /x/ are not standard phonemes, I decided to be like a comprehensive linguist and added both to both articles. If you want to remove either one or both from either this article, this one, or both, pleade feel free to do so. But if we/these can't stop these marginal phonemes from continuing to occur in English, then I don't know who/what will. JordiLopezboy (talk) 23:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the open back vowel for GA [ɒ] or [ɔ]? The chart shows [ɔ] but links to [ɒ], and the footnote regarding the cot-caught merger makes no mention of the latter. Itstooslim (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The phonemic symbol conventionally used to transcribe the (non-merged) GA THOUGHT vowel is /ɔ/, but actual phonetic realizations will vary from speaker to speaker among the different dialects that fall under the ill-defined umbrella of "General American". Many, of course, would pronounce it as [ɑ], and this increases with each successive generation. The symbols displayed in the chart for each dialect are the conventional transcription symbols, i.e. they are not intended to reflect the actual phonetic pronunciation when it differs from the conventional symbol. The links, however are meant to link to the article for the most phonetically accurate phone, i.e. the symbol displayed and the symbol linked to are not necessarily intended to be the same in cases when the conventional symbol differs from the current mainstream phonetic pronunciation. This is strikingly the case for Received Pronunciation, where about half the symbols displayed in the chart link to a different symbol (/ɒ/ links to [ɔ], /ɔː/ links to [oː], etc), as the conventional RP symbols are widely acknowledged to be phonetically inaccurate to modern RP pronunciation.

So the chart does not necessarily need fixing to either the displayed symbol or the article linked to. The sybmol displayed should definitely be /ɔ/, and the symbol linked to should be whatever is most phonetically accurate. In this specific case, I don't have a firm view on whether [ɒ] or [ɔ] is closer to the current median pronunciation of the THOUGHT vowel among GA speakers without the cot-caught merger. Likely some unmerged speakers have a realization closer to the former and other unmerged speakers have a realization to the latter. Indeed, the rise of the Low-Back-Merger Shift means that many merged young speakers now have a realization of their PALM-LOT-THOUGHT vowel in the [ɒ]~[ɔ] range. As far as I am aware, there has been no Geoff Lindsey-esque attempt to produce symbols that are phonetically accurate to modern GA. So I don't have a firm view on which article we should link to.

However, I will note hat the article itself is inconsistent, as the General America table links to [ɒ] but the RP and GA symbols table above links to [ɔ], despite the RP links going to the most phonetically appropriate articles rather than the articles for the transcription symbols. So, we need to decide which symbol is more phonetically appropriate to link to, and change one of the links to match. Offa29 (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:International Phonetic Alphabet chart for English dialects which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a "V-dropping" phenomenon that is systematically going on in English? A phenomenon of either the phone [v] being dropped, or [v] being dropped in a "L[vowel]V" combination. I've noticed this in television commercial ad copy, although I don't know if it's a "widespread" recognized change. The example that comes to my mind is where "lives" is pronounced closer to "lies". My dialect is (I think) midwest - Bloomington Indiana - whatever that is. Jimw338 (talk) "lies")" class="ext-discussiontools-init-timestamplink">16:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you have a source this article may use, this topic belongs in Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language. Nardog (talk) 09:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]