Talk:Edward Gibbons

Edward Gibbons has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 4, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance). England This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Composers This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:Edward Gibbons/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 11:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "and he later received degrees from the Cambridge University and Oxford University" perhaps you meant to say "from the Universities of Cambridge and Oxford".
  • Indeed! Done
• "at King's College, Cambridge as " comma after Cam.
  • Done
• "Clocke?. " don't need that double punc.
  • Done
• "former is particularly moving" seems like someone's opinion.
  • Clarified
• "1603 London plague outburst which " link. And shouldn't it be "to which"?
  • "To which" seems better; linked to bubonic plague as I don't think a more specific article exists for that time
• "more famous Orlando" is "more famous" needed? Encyclopedic even?
  • Changed to "better-known", if that's better? I would say yes, since Edward is minor figure compared to Orlando
• "c. 1540–1595" if it's only the 1540 which is circa, this should be c. 1540 – 1595.
  • I believe both are uncertain
    • Just checked, and your version makes more sense
• If this is BritEng (with strong ties I would imagine that makes sense), baptised is with an s, not a z. Check throughout.
  • Standardized, I believe
• "from Cambridge University and" the University of Cambridge.
  • Done
• Likewise for "the other place".
  • Done
• "1591/1592" previously just used two digits on the second year in consecutive year range like this. Check throughout.
  • Standardized
• "couple would have six" had?
  • Done
• "quarter shillings split" link specifically not to a generic article about "shilling".
  • linked to Shilling (British coin), instead
• "notorious" puts some POV on it, any reason why "known" isn't more encyclopedic in tone?
  • Good point, changed to your suggestion
• "are virtually unknown," by "virtually" do you mean "almost completely"?
  • Indeed, changed to "largely"
• "characterizes" ENGVAR.
  • Fixed
• "The works seem considerably routine, described" I would remove Wikipedia telling us how the works seem and stick with "The works are described..."
  • Clarified
• Could we get row scopes in the table too, for the name of the work?
  • Good point, done now
• Fix the last row (No other works...) so it doesn't sort, or remove it.
  • Fixed sorting
• "194r-199v" en-dash.
  • Fixed
• Harvard errors showing in the hidden categories, have you put a publication year for each use of the {{sfn}} template, for instance?
  • Indeed, seems to be a Rayner ref; fixed now

That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:53, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for this The Rambling Man. I believe I've addressed everything, but am happy to take another look should you find more issues. Aza24 (talk) 23:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]