Talk:Dollodon

	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Dinosaurs This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles

The image used here is identical to that of Mantellisaurus?--MWAK (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I drew the image that is currently in the artical and it used to be in the Mantellisaurus artical, but I made a mistake. It is based on Gregory Pauls skeletal which was in his 2000 Scientific American book of Dinosuars labled as Iguanodon atherfieldensis. In 2006 he created Mantellisaurus from Iguanodon atherfieldensis so I asumed that that skeletal would therefore be Mantellisaurus. However acording to his new paper that the specimen the drawing is based on is actually this new genus Dollodn. I have drawn the proper Mantellisaurus, here

Steveoc 86 (talk) 16:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, Both of these skeletals at one time were clasified as Iguanodon atherfieldensis. But have been split up, C is mantellisaurus and D is Dollodon. [[1]]. Steveoc 86 (talk) 16:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. I'll immediately insert the, quite beautiful, other picture!--MWAK (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, and thanks! Steveoc 86 (talk) 19:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reference about the status of Dollodon has been published (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667111000346)68.4.61.168 (talk) 21:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Seems to be the consensus? FunkMonk (talk) 10:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]