Talk:Despicable Me 2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Despicable Me 2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Despicable Me 2 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 3, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Despicable Me 2 received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American / Animated This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the American cinema task force. This article is supported by the Animated films task force. Animation: American / Films / Computer Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as High-importance). Comedy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Despicable Me 2 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 January 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the 2013 film Despicable Me 2 was predicted to be the most profitable film in the history of Universal Studios? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Despicable Me 2.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: July 7 to 13, 2013

Shouldn't there be at least a mention of who made the film ? I get that voice actors are important, but this is more than year's worth of work for animators and other artist at Illumination/MacGuff studio in Paris, and there is no mention of it in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.189.8 (talk) 11:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a better picture than what we have? (I like the picture, but we may be able to spark it up a little.) Coolness107 (talk) 01:17, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On http://www.movieposterdb.com/movie/1690953/Despicable-Me-2.html are all posters that have been released so far. The one currently in the infobox is the latest one.--Carniolus (talk) 08:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The trailer wasn't attached to Wreck-It Ralph by Disney -- per Disney's digital cinema tech docs, the trailers attached by Disney were for Monsters, Inc. and Oz the Great and Powerful. If you saw the trailer before Wreck-It Ralph (as I did), it was almost certainly placed by the theater. Trivialist (talk) 18:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, the caption under the theatrical release poster says it features 10,400 minions. If they counted that many, then that would be so funny. They actually wasted time on crap like that! xD -Scrat

Silas Ramsbottom, the head of the Anti-Villain League has replaced both Miss Hattie, Vector Perkins and his Dad that were in the main villians in Despicable Me 1. and Silas was now the main villian for Despicable Me 2. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.25.216 (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And about Miss Hattie?

I have something on my mind. Whatever did happen to El Macho? after his defeat by Fart Gun, I mean. Visokor (talk) 16:02, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the article states that seven books were released for the movie, but it only lists six. Does anyone know the seventh book, or if this is a typo? Rhydic (talk) 02:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page is being vandalize a LOT. I think we need to semi-protect it.Justaguy120 (talk) 03:27, 25 July 2013 (UTC) Justaguy120 (talk) 03:27, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that. --Alexandharrison (talk) 16:18, 29 December 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I wasn't able to. --Alexandharrison (talk) 16:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Coffin talks in this French interview why had Al Pacino left the film. Google translates the article too literally, so it would be great if someone fluent in French would translate the following text. Thanks!

"Il faudrait lui demander les vraies raisons pour lequel il a quitté le film. On suppose qu'il a eu peur du ridicule, son personnage étant plus grand (plus cartoon?) que nature. On avait une scène plus profonde qui en disait plus sur son personnage, mais on l'a retirée pour des questions de rythme. Il a demandé à ce qu'on la remette si on voulait qu'il reste. On a refusé. Benjamin est venu en renfort heureusement et à "doublé" Pacino avec talent. Merci à lui."

--Carniolus (talk) 21:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google translates to this:

"Should ask the real reasons for which he left the film. It is assumed he was afraid of ridicule, his character is larger (cartoon?) Than life. We had a most profound scene that spoke more about his character, but was removed for reasons of rhythm. He asked what if we wanted to furnish it remains. We refused. Benjamin came reinforcement happily and "doubled" Pacino with talent. Thank you to him."

--Carniolus (talk) 10:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would be surprised if Despicable Me 2 reached the billion dollar mark, making it the second animated film to do it after Toy Story 3. Do you think it will have a chance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.38.59.44 (talk) 16:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because I Wacth It On Cinemas And More--AedenWii (talk) 19:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about the game Minion Rush? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darren Chai (talk • contribs) 04:10, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is something in the Marketing section.--Carniolus (talk) 15:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA toolbox
Copyvio detector Authorship External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

This review is transcluded from Talk:Despicable Me 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 09:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. Thank you. Ssven2 (talk) 09:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, nice job with the article. Looks good at first glance. Ssven2 (talk) 09:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's good to see you here Ssven2. I'll be here addressing all issues and helping the article to get to GA status. Thanks. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 09:47, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Can you reduce the resolution of the images to say (both length and breadth should be between 200-400) please? Ssven2 (talk) 10:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done with the images. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 10:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Can you empty the references as per WP:LEAD and describe them in the later headings? Ssven2 (talk) 09:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure, done. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 10:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "A secret laboratory in the Arctic Circle containing a powerful mutagen known as PX-41 is stolen by a mysterious vehicle using a huge magnet." can be rephrased as "A mysterious vehicle using a huge magnet steals a powerful mutagen known as PX-41 from a secret laboratory in the Arctic Circle." Ssven2 (talk) 09:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 10:43, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "with his children. Antonio has left Margo for another girl. Gru uses his freeze-ray to freeze Antonio in a block of ice." - that line can be remoced and can simply end with "with his children". Ssven2 (talk) 09:50, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

removed unnecessary material. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 10:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Can you find a better synonym for "hand-glides"? Ssven2 (talk) 09:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it's done, I've wiki-linked it. It's an air sport name, and the word is "hang-glides" not "hand-glides." --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 10:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "in the first film" can be rephrased as "in the prequel." Ssven2 (talk) 09:54, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 10:57, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "they had started animating the film." can be rephrased as "they had started working on the film." Ssven2 (talk) 10:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 15:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "yellow carpet" - Can you find a source that states the reason why there was a yellow carpet primere. If not, remove the phrase and just say, "attended the primere." Ssven2 (talk) 10:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I couldn't find the source telling the reason, but I think it was because of "Yellow colored Minions." It's just my thought, but I think we should keep it as it is. There was a yellow carpet there, so it should be kept whether we know the reason or not. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 16:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "gave the film a 'C'" can be rephrased as "gave the film a C grade" for both Entertainment Weekly and A. V. Club Ssven2 (talk) 10:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's done. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 16:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "n the 100-year history of Universal Studios" can be rephrased as "for Universal Studios." Ssven2 (talk) 10:24, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think we should keep this one as it is. It tells the accurate fact of the film's gross that it was the most profitable film in the history of Universal. It's an interesting fact. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 16:44, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• "topped the box office for two consecutive weekends" can be rephrased as "remained in the first position at the box office for two consecutive weekends." for both the sections "North America" and "Outside North America". Ssven2 (talk) 10:24, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's done. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 02:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Captain Assassin!: Address these concerns and the article is passed. Ssven2 (talk) 10:24, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssven2: Please take a look back at the article and see if anything left. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 02:05, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   Has underwent a C/e from WP:GOCE so no issues regarding prose, there were few, I fixed them while reviewing. Quotes use " " and have sources backing them up. So Criteria 1a is good for me.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.

   Pass or Fail:

@Captain Assassin!: Congratulations, Despicable Me 2 has passed. Ssven2 (talk) 03:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's great, thank you Ssven2. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 03:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Despicable Me 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130925234427/http://www.cinepolis.com.mx:80/_CARTELERA/sinopsis.aspx?ip=13728 to http://www.cinepolis.com.mx/_CARTELERA/sinopsis.aspx?ip=13728
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140220162401/http://diarioadn.co/cali/mi-ciudad/cali-ciudad-pionera-en-colombia-en-cine-4dx-1.67006 to http://diarioadn.co/cali/mi-ciudad/cali-ciudad-pionera-en-colombia-en-cine-4dx-1.67006

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Romics 2013 - Autumn Edition - panoramio (1).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:08, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]