Talk:Deep Blue Aerospace

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Rocketry This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Spaceflight Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deep Blue Aerospace yesterday conducted a one kilometre level launch and landing VTVL test with its Nebula-M test article, as part of development of the Nebula-1 reusable orbital launcher, link to source article here The era of commercial rocket 2.0 is coming | Deep Blue Aerospace "Nebula-M" test rocket has completed a vertical recovery flight test of kilometer-level VTVL Deep Blue Aerospace, Jiangsu Deep Blue Aerospace Co., Ltd. 2022-05-07 (source is in Chinese). Cheers. N2e (talk) 16:20, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For what it’s worth, the landing shown in the tweeted video appears to have been manipulated. It abruptly changes frame rate, seeming to show a slower descent than real. The fact that the video cuts off at the apparent instant of ground contact (and before the dust cloud clears) suggests it might have had a harder landing than desired. Similar to SpaceX’s SN8, perhaps. Tarl N. (discuss) 22:28, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]