Talk:Dan McTeague

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Canada: Ontario / Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario. This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

This line appears midway through the article...

"Some critics, nevertheless, believe that this position panders to homophobia in parts of the electorate."

I believe this statement should be removed, not because a citation is needed to verify its source, but because it is a biased and unfounded statement regarding oposition to gay marriage.

- mav-tgif, 04.07.06

"He is also known to have a pro-life stance on abortion issues." - Does anyone have a source for this?

His election literature in 2004 noted he was the only pro-life candidate running in Pickering-Scarborough East, but I no longer have a copy of that. - I'll see what else I can dig up. 22:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Source material can be found here: ^[1] D a keldsen (talk) 18:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC) D. Keldsen 18:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC).[reply]

So you think that the Reynolds article was incorrect. What makes you think that? What rules are you citing? EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 22:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

highly unlikely and completely uncited. In any case its hardly relevant. Why would you revert an edit that removes just the word 'accurately'? And why revert the talk page asking the question?

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dan McTeague. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080610040033/http://cnews.canoe.ca:80/CNEWS/Canada/2008/03/11/4973266-cp.html to http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2008/03/11/4973266-cp.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dan McTeague. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110913070123/http://danmcteague.liberal.ca/biography/ to http://danmcteague.liberal.ca/biography/
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar%2FLayout%2FArticle_Type1&c=Article&cid=1135119019559&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154
• Added archive https://archive.is/20080309223026/http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=357697 to http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=357697

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why Diesel fuel went $0.13 this morning 65.95.48.221 (talk) 19:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]