Talk:Cliviger

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lancashire and Cumbria Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. UK geography Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

According to the article, the village had a railway station until a major accident closed the station in 1909. No source is cited for this, and as far as I know the only railway station in the area was Holme railway station, which closed in 1930. —Snigbrook 00:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

there is one 195.213.83.58 (talk) 20:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Claim that Cliviger is one of the largest parishes in the UK appears to be untrue.

Assuming that ‘largest’ refers to its geographic area:

A quick look a Lancashire County Council’s mapping site (Access here) shows that in Lancashire alone, parishes such as Bowland Forest High, Over Wyresdale, and North Turton (all rural in nature) are considerably bigger. Although I haven’t checked, I doubt that Lancashire contains all of the largest parishes in the country.

If ‘largest’ refers to its population:

Cliviger 2,350

Briercliffe 3,187

North Turton 3,736

Hapton, Lancashire 3,769

I believe this claim probably relates to the Ecclesiastical parish of Whalley, which in medieval times was believed to be the second largest in England (referenced here on page iv). Cliviger was part of this parish, and the Rev. Dr. Whitaker (who built the Church and was its first Vicar) wrote a book about it. Full text available at archive.org

As such I plan to remove that or other similar claims unless they offer a persuasive reference (the parish website is not enough). --Trappedinburnley (talk) 19:25, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cliviger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615100022/http://www.burnley.gov.uk/site/scripts/councillors.php?viewBy=specificWard&wardID=41 to http://www.burnley.gov.uk/site/scripts/councillors.php?viewBy=specificWard&wardID=41
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081121051612/http://www.wyorksgeologytrust.org/calderdale/cliviger.html to http://www.wyorksgeologytrust.org/calderdale/cliviger.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://archive.thisislancashire.co.uk/1999/4/27/773709.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20150313063815/http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/archive/1996/10/19/6195119.All_in_the_line_of_duty_for_John/ to http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/archive/1996/10/19/6195119.All_in_the_line_of_duty_for_John/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402112444/http://www.pendlemoviemakers.org.uk/ to http://www.pendlemoviemakers.org.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cliviger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721192819/http://www.cliviger.info/index.html to http://www.cliviger.info/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cliviger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303202328/http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/viewFullDataset.do?instanceSelection=03070&productId=779&$ph=60_61&datasetInstanceId=3070&startColumn=1&numberOfColumns=8&containerAreaId=790436 to http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/viewFullDataset.do?instanceSelection=03070&productId=779&$ph=60_61&datasetInstanceId=3070&startColumn=1&numberOfColumns=8&containerAreaId=790436
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140826120258/http://www.mysteriousbritain.co.uk/festivals/october/halloween-samhain.html to http://www.mysteriousbritain.co.uk/festivals/october/halloween-samhain.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]