Talk:Constance Cumbey

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Indiana Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance). Christianity: Baptist Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Baptist work group. This article has been marked as needing an infobox. Women in Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Cumbey (talk · contribs) / Cumbey, Constance Cumbey, Constance

The material that was here has been moved to Talk:Javier Solana. David Cannon 10:34, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

On April 16, 2005 this page was nominated for deletion. The result of the debate was to keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Constance E. Cumbey for discussion. Mackensen (talk) 15:25, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I think the article should be called Constance Cumbey which is a redirect so would need an admin to do it. What do others think? --SqueakBox 19:11, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

I have reverted the removal of Cumbey's published works, which I consider to be unjustified. Articles about authors frequently list their works. BTW, I agree that the article should be redirected to remove the middle initial. I'll do it now. David Cannon 00:50, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In your revert you attempted to humiliate me by giving my contribs in your edit summary. I have removed the duplication of Cumbey's works as unnecessary and the speculation about a new book and about her being User:Cumbey as unsourced and therefore unencyclopedic. Davidcannon falsely accused me of being Cumbey's sockpuppet, for which he apologised to me but not to Cumbey, --SqueakBox 16:37, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Good god, we're voting to keep conspiracy tards' vanity pages now? --Sparks Light

SparksLight, if you are a coincidence theorist, you, my friend, are the tard.

To the subject of the article: no offence, but you sound like you could use a major deprogramming. This is all End Times programming triggering and will aid the New World Order rather than hurt it.

Leave her a message at http://cumbey.blogspot.com/ SqueakBox 18:15, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

Constance, you've really got to stop editing this article. It makes you look bad, you know. And you don't hide it well - using the term inter alia is a dead giveaway, for instance, and who else would know about your father's cousin? But more importantly, your edits aren't good Wikipedia. An article is not a debate; criticism doesn't get a rebuttal. Especially when the rebuttal consists of little more than "but Cumbey said they were wrong." Eaglizard 05:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is "inter alia" a dead giveaway of anything other than someone being a college grad—currently ~34% of American adults—of the punctilious ilk, who suffered through 4 years of APA and MLA formatting style, et cetera, and never quite kicked the habit? JohndanR (talk) 22:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constance Cumbey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927103851/http://www.thebyteshow.com/ConstanceCumbey.html to http://www.thebyteshow.com/ConstanceCumbey.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]