[go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

Talk:Comfort food

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LijiaH.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion of the Comfort Foods concepts

[edit]

I would tend to agree with all the statements that the article needs updating. First of all let me say that all food is comforting to me (or all the foods that I eat are comforting to me). Those of us who had the privilege of growing up and living on the coast seafood is more comforting than meatloaf, which I have eaten once in 63 years. That was about 58 years ago. No seafood on the list? 24.74.161.189 00:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am in complete agreement that the article needs updating, and am attempting to incorporate the fact the indeed foods bring comfort to every corner of our planet. While I agree a firmer concept is needed, perhaps based on a study or studies, there is a real sense that based on certain criteria we can at least demonstrably list a few examples of comforts foods enjoyed by persons everwhere, and why they are considered comforting. I encourage all who feel a need to talk here also list a comfort food enjoyed, and why.

The article should be shrunk down. After a 40 year trend toward increase diversity and sophistication in the American (and other parts of the world) palate, the word emerged to retroactively describe simpler fare. That's it. Say it's "informal" and stop trying to nail it down or enumerate it. 74.68.152.245 (talk) 00:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional examples from other cultures

[edit]

Sorry for not having a account but... As a Swede, I would definitely consider Pannkakor (Scandinavian pancakes/crepes) as comfort food in sweden. Unofrtunately, I just can't come up with any other food for the category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.78.215.159 (talk) 15:54, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

my apologies for throwing in my 2 cents but as a German I have to tell you that - if you believe in such a concept as "comfort food" - then the two items you have listed here for Germany are utter nonsense. You will also have to keep in mind that cuisine as such has a strongly regional aspect so if you don't know anything about the regional differences in any given country you will come up with ideas that don't work at all. Actually, the fact that both Bratwurst and Potato_salad#Germany are mentioned here seems to me more like a slur than anything else - because "that's what Germans eat." The whole concept of "Trostmahlzeiten", "Essen für die Seele" or rather "Nervennahrung" as we call it, is mostly in very, very sweet kinds of food (comfort meals, food for the soul and food to calm your nerves, respectively; the translations do not really work but they are approximations.) My comfort food is cinnamon-spiced, sugared rice pudding. --M.Buelles (talk) 21:19, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

not to forget the german concept of "hausmannskost" (when jamie oliver presented steak, liver & bacon as a "comfort food dish" it was translated as "hausmannskost"). also known in other northern european countries (dansk, norsk, bokmål svenska). 87.175.174.7 (talk) 09:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to make changes as you see fit. Vranak (talk) 21:24, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This article is not covering measure countries such as India, where we see a number of comfort food varieties in vogue. For example, Vadapaw, Idli, Masala dosa, Samosa, Bhajia or Pakoda, Shig Kabab. If possible, I would like to add them here. Pathare Prabhu (talk) 13:41, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Physical effects of comfort foods

[edit]

This article could also use a section on the direct physiological effects of comfort foods. A substantial majority of comfort foods are based heavily on simple carbohydrate, which has been postulated to induce an opiate-like effect in the brain. Emotional eating also may stem from this effect.

I think a lot of comfort food gives comfort simply because of the effect of easily-and-quickly digestible carbohydrates on one's blood sugar. However, what about comfort food that is not based on carbohydrates? I've heard a thing or two about chicken used as a comfort food because of certain amino acids that it contains in high quantities. In general, people need to be prepared for the possibility that comfortd foods aren't just a trick of psychology, but that there is a real physiological truth behind at least some of it.--Peter Knutsen (talk) 14:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List is pointless

[edit]

Having a list of foods makes no sense. Every person has their own list of comfort foods. For some it might be coke and hot dogs, for someone else it could be grits and orange juice. Delete the list and just explain the notion of a comfort food and if availlable, the effects and social role. Easytoremember 03:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe a list might not be pointless, if it has a good source associated with it, like a statistical survey. But I agree that the list as it stands seems a bit pointless. --Phelan 03:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find the list ridiculous, especially the sections of comfort foods in random other countries. These lists should be moved to the appropriate page such as Indian cuisine. - GilliamJF 07:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The list must go. Who has the will to actually delete/replace it? jankyalias 01:38, 28 Novemeber 2006

I will. I came to the talk page to request the list be removed, but I see there's already a consensus for that. I believe "comfort food" is an important topic that can evolve into an extremely high quality article. This list is standing in the way; it makes the article too long to read, without adding any content. I wrote an article here on Night eating syndrome after reading a survey of the clinical material available, then revised it slightly after talking to a psychiatrist, who agrees that NES is an eating disorder but feels there's an emotional component in many people just across the borderline between disorder, and symptom. He pointed out that the diet of the night eater is always what would be considered comfort food. This is only one disorder, affecting a pretty small percent of the population, but somebody else linked to "emotional eating," and, well, I feel there's a lot of importance in this article. Just to be clear, eating "comfort foods" isn't a pathology in itself. Ben & Jerry's is better for you than stress. But in a very stressful world of "fast food nation" I think there's great importance here. FireWeed 21:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The list has been the object of concern for three years. Long enough. There was a single cited item. I left that. But it sure looks weird to have just one item from Japan cited. This article needs a complete rebuild, and needs to rely on WP:RS. I'm not sure there's anything to the concept really except for shared objects of culinary nostalgia. DavidOaks (talk) 22:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing food abuse section; expanding article

[edit]

In the process of expanding the article I am taking out all references to eating disorders. Comfort food is a type of cuisine and/or a description of food styles. It has absolutely nothing to do with eating disorders, which are independent of the type of food consumed. Moreover, there is no citation to even make the claim that comfort food and food abuse are related. You wouldn't put a section on bulimia in an article about donuts or fast food or Greek cuisine; it doesn't belong here either. For reference I am pasting the removed text here.

Associated eating disorders

[edit]

The vast majority of people who enjoy good tasting food do so in moderation, and are generally in good health, mentally and physically. However, the potential for "mis-use" exists, and individuals who are suffering depression or some anxiety disorders may regularly turn to food for comfort or to cope with stress, anxiety, fear, or any number of negative emotions. As the individual turns more and more to food to satisfy an emotional need, an eating disorder can result.

Bulimia is a disorder in which the individual suffers anxiety about his or her body image, turns to fattening foods and drinks for comfort, and then vomits them to avoid weight gain. Night eating syndrome is a disorder in which a person is unable to sleep, and turns to food as an answer to their insomnia, and other emotional needs. While both of these affect relatively small percentages of the population, in both the "comfort value" of the food plays a central role in the disorder.

Overly Expanded Concept

[edit]

As I recall, the term "comfort food" was coined, not to enrich the world with another term for "home cooking", but to describe foods specific to individuals that are eaten, yes, for comfort, i.e., the term accentuates the psychological rather than nutritional value of such foods. The US television icon for this phenomenon is the slender, fashionable woman with a pint of Häagen Dasz sitting alone in front of the television. In this sense, I think the opening paragraph is overly broad. If the term has expanded, then I would appreciate some documentation other than this article. Are restaurants adding a "comfort food" list, for instance? In choosing a restaurant, do people now ask, "Do you want Thai, Italian, or comfort?"Janko (talk) 16:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Janko[reply]

PS:To the person who can't imagine beans as a comfort food, yet complains of a lack of global perspective: beans on toast is a traditional British home meal, and I'm sure there are many Britons for whom it functions as comfort food. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Janko (talk • contribs) 16:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, comfort food is a genre of restaurant food.[1][2][3] There are hundreds, probably thousands, of newspaper citation for this.Wikidemo (talk) 16:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This usage by the food industry and press — novel, associative, and secondary — should be treated separately, since by the original definition, a "comfort food" would not likely contain truffle oil and an American would not be looking for comfort food in Paris, when anyone other than your NYT food editor would refer to "simple traditional French dishes".

"Comfort foods are foods whose consumption evoke a psychologically pleasurable state for a person," reported Brian Wansink, an Illinois marketing professor who heads the lab. Drawing from national survey questionnaires, the lab has concluded that a person’s comfort-food preferences are formed at an early age and are triggered, in addition to hunger, by conditioned associations and gender differences.[4]

The clarity of this definition is what's missing from this article. One shouldn't confuse the substance of a concept with its commercial exploitation, though that should be treated as well. Janko (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:37, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comfort food is a style of simple, hearty fine dining restaurant cuisine designed to appeal to people's sense of place. That's a significant, sourceable culinary trend in the United States. We do cover the business and economic world - shops, and not just the products and services they sell. Comfort food in restaurants is certainly different than comfort food eaten at home. When covering a style of restaurant food we generally cover both the food itself and the restaurant concept - e.g. Buffet, teppanyaki, salad bar, and so on. Wikidemo (talk) 01:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your "significant, sourceable culinary trend" represents a derivative use of the original definition of "comfort food" and should definitely be covered because of its novelty. A simple glance at Google hits reveals that the vast majority still are using the term in its original personal, domestic meaning, not as the term has been appropriated by the food industry. Yet this article begins discussing a "style" of food, thus obscuring the difference between, say, my mother eating a rather disgusting (to me) sludge of crackers and milk when she was depressed, and yuppifying traditional dishes and charging $35 for an entree. "Comfort food is *also* a style of simple, hearty fine dining restaurant cuisine designed to appeal to people's sense of place", but without the "also" and an appropriate organization of this article, that definition is woefully incomplete.Janko (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 14:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Western concept

[edit]

This idea of a "comfort food" is a western concept or at least anglo concept. I'm a native speaker of Chinese (and also fluent in English) and we don't have this concept or term that speaks of "comfort food". We have this concept of home-cooked food but that is not the same as the English meaning of "comfort food." Thus, I'm raising objections to indicate that the article should particularly point out that comfort food is a western (or anglo, which ever it may be) concept. --71.146.24.9 (talk) 22:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the "Other Countries" section, I would like to ask who is defining the concept of "comfort food" for these countries such as Japan and India. Perhaps it is westerners who are looking at miso soup, roti, ramen noodles and imposing the idea of "comfort food" onto these cultures when the idea of "comfort food" does not exist (perhaps) in these cultures? The idea of comfort food is not the same as home-cooked meal. I suggest we remove that section and stick to countries that actually use the concept of "comfort food". --71.146.24.9 (talk) 22:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted as unsupported opinion. The Japanese sentence was sourced to the New York Times. Japan certainly has a distinction between down home food (available at restaurants and at home) from formal food at restaurants. I suspect most cultures do - actually, not a cultural question so much as an industry / economic one. When people start eating out more and more, some seek comforts of homestyle food. In the US and apparently Japan that is a food industry phenomenon. It would be useful if those proposing to add info from other countries (or adding any material) could cite a source to make clear they're really describing the phenomenon and not just local cuisine. Wikidemo (talk) 18:45, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant last paragraphs

[edit]

Just noticed that the last paragraphs were almost exact copies of each other--just wanted to let you guys know. 67.161.93.146 (talk) 21:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Middle-East to Arab World

[edit]

The comfort foods described in the 'Middle-East' section are specific to Arab cuisine, including North Africa. Furthermore, they are neither popular nor comfort foods in other parts of the Middle-East such as Iran or Turkey for example. Iran also has it's own section, therefore making a very general 'Middle-East' section redundant. So I changed the titke to the more appropriate and accurate 'Arab World'. Pink Princess (talk) 09:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poland

[edit]

The list mentions Pierogi, Chlodnik, gingerbread cookies... what an utter mess. We don't even have the concept of 'comfort food' in Poland. And according to the definition, a comfort food is easy to prepare. I can't see how any of these foods can be prepared easily. Coming from a different culture, I feel that this article didn't really make the concept any clearer to me. And there is no research supporting any of the statements made, neither social, psychological nor nutritional-scientific. This article seems very un-encyclopedic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.28.142.137 (talk) 20:16, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

rewrite

[edit]

I got rid of the long list of uncited examples, and added material that turned up in a search of Google Scholar hits, though the results now need editing for coherence and general style. Lists should not be added unless they come from WP:RS's I'm hoping that we now have an article, maybe stubby, that makes sense of the concept as more than a list of faves. It's been studied by marketing specialists, anthropologists, health care professionals, etc. I would be surprised if it has not been treated in articles on eating disorders, on cultural hisotry (you can't have comfort food until a mobile society begins to experience alienation) and economics (this is a phenomenon of abundance and choice). But I do not yet have sources for those things. DavidOaks (talk) 16:16, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's a lot of good stuff in there, but a few issues in particular. The lede sentence, I think, does not define comfort food very closely. It's a category of food, and perhaps a cultural phenomenon, not a term. The term is defined by culture and popular awareness, not science, anthropology, or health. By default, all different types of food are consumed by choice (what's the alternative)? And eating to feel better? That could apply to any cuisine. I think the original lede was closer to the mark - it mentions correctly that comfort food is simple, hearty, familiar food cooked at home or eaten in informal restaurants. I'm sure that's in the sources somewhere, but one problem with most sources about comfort food is that they assume the reader knows what it is, and then describe a specific restaurant or dish as comfort food. The academic sources assume often-simplistic and imprecise definitions as their premise (e.g. food you eat to feel good), then elaborate on that. The simplistic definitions admit foods (ice cream, potato chips, chocolate, junk food) that I don't think most people would consider comfort food. It also leads to the questionable conclusion that comfort food is not a collection of foods - I think it is, it is just a different collection for different communities. My hunch is that there are plenty of sources that will list specific foods as comfort foods. Although the lists were indeed uncited, and prose form is far preferable, it is helpful to list examples so that readers can get the point. Also, the scientific studies should all be in a section on America, if they are about Americans. It is a little tricky to generalize. There is a source (written from an American perspective) that describes Japanese comfort foods, and presumably one could find comfort foods in every culture. Is that because these cultures all have their own concept of comfort food, or is it that Americans, thinking about comfort food, find analogous types of food elsewhere? - Wikidemon (talk) 18:11, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The sources given are strictly scietific, and they're all in agreement that it's a category of food use for psychological purposes (as opposed to simply acquiring calories), also that these are active choices rather than default acceptance of what's available. Sources don't agree that it's simple or has anything to do with home, although some identify that as one psychological category. If there is a definitive collection of comfort foods according to WP:RS's we should include that list, but people's particular ideas accumulated for three years with only one citation. DavidOaks (talk) 19:01, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, but it's not a scientific subject, so the scientific information is a bit of a side issue here. You can't prove a premise, and as I said, they seem to take as their premise something that may or may not be the issue. Obviously it satisfies some kind of desire, that's the "comfort" in comfort food. But characterizing it as a psychological phenomenon as opposed to a cultural or culinary one seems to miss the point. There are 2.5 million ghits (per my cookies, yours may vary)[5] versus 5,800 in google scholar[6] (an unusually high ratio) and 32,000 book references.[7] Many of them do describe specific foods. It seems pretty likely that somewhere amidst the recipes, restaurant reviews, blogs, and other unusable stuff, there is some reliable description of comfort food as a cultural and food matter. - Wikidemon (talk) 20:02, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't follow -- "it's not a scientific subject"? If scientists write about it, how could it be otherwise? Now, maybe there's a different definition in circulation for popular culture, but we then have the problem of determining a proper authority there -- linguists and mass culture scholars would be the best bet. So if we can find such WP:RS's, let's include them. But the problem with definition byt list is that one must demonstrate principles of inlcusion and exclusion, as well as comprehensiveness. The trouble with the old article was, "comfort food" was indistinguishable from "Yummy stuff" -- that is, entirely arbitrary, with no systematic way of saying why something might or might not be included. Having principles allows us to avoid the list. Analogy: it is easier to define "blue" in terms of wavelengths than by listing everything that might be described as "blue." DavidOaks (talk) 20:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent) Later -- wow, this turns out to be hard! I tried googling the exact phrase "comfort foods are" -- and WP:RS's are few, even by the most generous definition, but even where we find one, the definition seems to be treated as self-evident. One site says they're made at home, but that's a problem for the many that include pizza (which few of us make from scratch). Another says they're easy to prepare, but that's not true of soups, stews, home-made spaghetti sauces (unless we mean canned stuff)...there does seem to be agreement that they're not optimum nutrition, just on the basis of all those sites offering helathy alternatives to comfort foods -- low-fat, -salt, -carb, -cal...so where does that leave us? DavidOaks (talk) 21:09, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Additional references

[edit]

I would like to add references to other sites but I'm not sure where to add them - the Further Reading section seems to have only books. May I add a reference to this web site which I think would be helpful to readers? Nutritional Comparison of Many Comfort Foods http://www.fitsugar.com/Nutritional-Comparison-Many-Comfort-Foods-1084313 --Bill.albing (talk) 21:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where does Mexico fit into this equation?

[edit]

Because I'm fairly certain the concept of "comfort food" is a part of Mexican cuisine as well. Seeing as though I'm a second generation American of Mexican descent, I can only hazard guesses as to what these food items would be, but if I had to guess, such a list would include chicken mole, tamales, barbacoa, tortas, chorizo, menudo, reposteria (or what some might called "polvorones" -- Mexican wedding cookies), buñuelos, Mexican hot chocolate, and that milky drink made with masa that tastes very faintly of chocolate, whose name I can't recall. Oh, and flan too. But that's just my guess and it could be partly influenced by American Mexican cuisine. I mean, I very much recall eating barbacoa in Mexico and believe menudo is an actual Mexican dish, but it might not bring as much comfort to a regular Mexican as it would an American of Mexican descent such as myself. So help from an actual Mexican would be very much appreciated, y gracias para su ayuda. 69.149.105.46 (talk) 06:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How about removing the list on this article (again! - 2007 and now 2012)

[edit]

Hi there! The list is going nowhere. It was removed in 2007 but came back again. Excellent points were made back in 2006 and 2007 on the reasons why it should be removed but editors clearly didn't look at the Talk page. I have met with too much resistance on even small overhauls recently on this kind of page. IMHO the only good reference listed is the one from the US, at least supported by a poll. The others I can judge of are often frankly ridiculous. Rdavout (talk) 11:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. In my opinion it's a simple matter of routine article maintenance. This is one of those articles about a popular subject that lots of people enjoy and have an opinion on, so over time it begins to accumulate haphazard contributions that need to be organized, trimmed, and possibly removed. There are so many different comfort foods in different cuisines, and no universal criteria, so coming up with a definitive list is a hopeless task. It may be possible to make a list specific to the US or a particular cuisine, but a global list would just be too long. Any list we do make is going to be arbitrary and incomplete, so the encyclopedic purpose if any is a matter of exposition, to teach the reader by use of select examples - that's a matter of editorial discretion. For anyone building a list, it's probably better to use templates or categories. - Wikidemon (talk) 15:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the issue of unintended propoganda or advertising. That's right, comfort food is a subjective concept. Examples only turn this article into something more gonzo than it should ever be. It should be a highly dictionary like piece on this psychological concept. Afterall, good taste may be primarily personal, common trends of localized consumers, and a logical scientific practice, but a comfort food is only personal and trends are really just trends not actually in assistance of any definition, rather said popular foods surely conform to the definition lending that people of a certain location may show similar psychological behavior(obviously). The definition alone is of far more importance and value especially to psychologists, dieticians/food health practitioners, or anyone looking for the actual answer to the question: What is comfort food? The answer is anything edible but its selection follows a purely personal psychological criteria that may generate trends when masses are tallied but cannot rely on or reference trend data for its own definition to be purely observational. 24.52.222.241 (talk) 17:46, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian section

[edit]

The Canadian list is nothing but uncited stereotypes. Comfort foods in Canada are likely to be as diverse as (and probably significantly overlaps with) the US list. I also suspect there is significant regional variation (e.g. Tim Hortons doesn't seem to be as popular out west as it is in Ontario, poutine is probably mostly a comfort food in Quebec and less so elsewhere). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.41.189 (talk) 21:10, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Half of the listed items are not even comforting foods. The majority of the listed items in the American comfort foods I can associate as comforting foods. Where does this information even come from? All I see in the Canadian list is items most prevalently manufactured in Canada (which does not constitute them as being comforting). - 24.36.109.251 (talk) 21:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chicken soup? REALLY? No need to sign my name not everyone likes chicken soup with four pieces of bread claiming it to be a comfort dish, it should be noted that comfort food is food that is comfortable, not for when your sick - it is just soup that makes you feel better there is a difference between feeling better and comfort food- example comfort food oatmeal and bacon is a good comfort food because it feels you up and is warm on a cold day (my idea of a comfort food) just an example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.122.12 (talk) 00:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added citations and removed some silly entries (yoghurt??) but the list is still too long. It needs more citations and then culling of uncited entries. — Molly-in-md (talk) 22:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

checkY Did more work: added citations, added a few more real Canadian comfort foods per citations, and removed some generic listings without backup (really? somebody wrote "casserole"??). It's more manageable and more real, now, I think. Feel free to cull further, though. — Molly-in-md (talk) 15:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Polish food

[edit]

The recent additions of Polish-language names for foods are unintelligible to non-Polish readers. Please translate these terms and/or Wikilink to articles describing them, similar to the section on Russian foods, for example. Reify-tech (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American section

[edit]

I've deleted most of this. One bit wasn't even sourced to an article about comfort foods, another was just original research with a link that didn't mention the content of the sentence, and the 3rd was the 2004 About.com poll. That wasn't a reliable source. It was based on a forum discussion with only 281 replies, a number of which weren't actually stating their favorite foods. Too tiny, too limited to be in the article. Dougweller (talk) 10:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these lists are far too long, we need a limit

[edit]

Some of these lists are far too long - we should decide on a limit. These are only going to be examples, after all. We don't need a large number of desserts - aren't they all comfort food? Sure, chocolate chip cookies are comfort food, so are all cookies. Crumble is a comfort food, if we mention it we don't have to list all the varieties. Dougweller (talk) 10:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that the lists seem a problem. Not sure in my opinion if it's that some are too long, that most are just a bunch of names/links with no additional info, or that there are too many lists one after the other.
Dunno if an item limit is practical or desirable. For one, there's no real mechanism for getting editors to observe an arbitrary limit.
I do find the annotated lists, like Poland and Puerto Rico, MUCH better, they offer usable content whether you are browsing or specifically looking for something; the utility of an unannotated list seems much more limited, unless you know what you're looking for by name, you have to click through each one that is linked, and are at a dead end for those that don't have articles. We're not just an index or database of facts, articles should be readable and inviting! Maybe encouraging by example annotated lists (by example meaning, do a bunch yourself and hope it catches on! :).
Same as for annotated lists, introductory paragraphs seem a big improvement, as in Indonesia and Turkey.
@Dougweller Hahahahahahahaha, "a list of all the varieties of fruit crumble is unnecessary" - you have to go a long way to beat that as an edit summary! --Tsavage (talk) 04:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Comfort food. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comfort Food Definition

[edit]

The definition is seemingly negative and could be expanded, seeing as though psychology research has delved into the topic. In addition, I noticed that under the US/American culture has a lot of foods that are either 1) not of American origin or 2) specifically African American dishes. I will possibly expand this, seeing as though I am a student in a class on food. I will use resources from Jstor and my university's database. --Cheesesteaklover16 (talk) 03:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added some information to the definition of Comfort food and well as the phycological studies like negative emotions and how it effects the way we eat and how we tend to deal with different emotions, this where comfort eating is usually derived from. LijiaLijiaH (talk) 20:46, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comfort food and Instant Noodles

[edit]

Not sure if instant noodles, "comfortable" as a snack on a 9 to 5 job, actually fits the idea of comfort food. Smells like WP:NOTNEWS and\or WP:NOTABILITY. 2A00:1FA0:120:1B83:178F:7861:C47B:1AE8 (talk) 09:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait.
The source is British, not American (B.B.C.). Deleted the nonsense, that's for sure. 2A00:1FA0:120:1B83:178F:7861:C47B:1AE8 (talk) 10:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Two words: Junk food.
Summary: Instant noodles can be made with low-quality oil, and include lots of MSG and artificial flavoring. That is why this entry is "junk food" rather than "comfort food". 2A00:1FA0:6A4:5265:0:5F:A935:6501 (talk) 17:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous Comments on Origins of the Term "Comfort Food"

[edit]

The comments in this article about the origins of the term "comfort food" are erroneous. There is a book called the Oxford English Dictionary that documents the term as far back as 1962. 128.36.7.163 (talk) 01:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Comfort_food&oldid=1217306524"