Talk:Brackley

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Northamptonshire Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northamptonshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northamptonshire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorthamptonshireWikipedia:WikiProject NorthamptonshireTemplate:WikiProject NorthamptonshireNorthamptonshire articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Primary school#United Kingdom|primary schools]] The anchor (#United Kingdom) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The latter half of the "Future" section seems to be very slightly biased in the respect that it seems to be expressing opinion as opposed to the pure facts —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.103.199 (talk) 21:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not only biased, but it's poorly written, subjective and not cited at all. It should be removed. 193.32.3.83 (talk) 13:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been tagged since Sept 2008 as needing clean up. It has been listed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Northamptonshire as needing urgent attention. Please address these issues if you can. Thanks.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Brackley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008053113/http://www.workhouses.org.uk/index.html?Brackley/Brackley.shtml to http://www.workhouses.org.uk/index.html?Brackley/Brackley.shtml
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.waynfleteinfants.ik.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060424061600/http://www.brackleyathletic.org.uk:80/ to http://www.brackleyathletic.org.uk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100317131657/http://www.dft.gov.uk:80/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/summary/ to http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/summary/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707130528/http://umapper.s3.amazonaws.com/maps/kml/58620.kml to http://umapper.s3.amazonaws.com/maps/kml/58620.kml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Brackley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.workhouses.org.uk/index.html?Brackley%2FBrackley.shtml
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.waynfleteinfants.ik.org/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.localauthoritypublishing.co.uk/councils/brackley/lake.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100317131657/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/summary/ to http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/summary/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707130528/http://umapper.s3.amazonaws.com/maps/kml/58620.kml to http://umapper.s3.amazonaws.com/maps/kml/58620.kml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]