Talk:Botolphs

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sussex Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state "Hamlets that are within another parish or council ward could have their own articles, but if there is no more than a couple of paragraphs that could be said about the hamlet it may be best practice to merge the articles."

Although Annington, West Sussex is in the civil parish of Bramber, a small discussion at Talk:Bramber#Merge Proposal concluded that merging Annington into this article would be more appropriate.

I propose that the Annington article be merged into the Botolphs article - this would just be converting Annington into a redirect to Boltophs as all the information on Annington is already included within this article. My personal opinion is that a combined article, where you can see all the hamlets on a single page, is more informative for the reader. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 20:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree

--Doug (talk) 08:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion seems finished, so I made the redirect.

--Doug (talk) 19:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]