Talk:Boch Center

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Theatre Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical music This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles United States: Massachusetts / Boston Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston. National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The principal advantage of using the Wiki-standard markup features for headers is that you'll get an automatically-built table of contents appearing near the top of the article. For this reason, it's better to use the standard Wiki markup than to try and "roll your own".

For more details, see Wikipedia:How to edit a page#Wiki markup.

Atlant 17:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have left this message for Atlant who has re-reverted my edit.

"Look at the history of the edits here. A series on non-grammatical entries keep appearing. In addition, while they reflect something that happended at the Wang Center, they are not a part of its operation on a regualr basis.

So do we list every single one of the outside organizations which rent the Center and put on shows there? I believe NOT.

I am posting this note on the TALK PAGE of the Talk:Wang Center for the Performing Arts in order to solicit other opinionsd as to whether this is kind of thing which should be a part of this article.

Please any comments there: it is the most relevant place for all to see."

:It is my opinion that minor stuff like this should be REMOVED Vivaverdi 03:28, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ungrammatical? There's nothing ungrammatical about the entry. And it's reasonably notable that the American TV show Jeopardy! taped a series at the Wang Center. And there's nothing that requires that we only write about events that occur "on a regualr [sic] basis".

I think I'll revert you again.

Atlant 23:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As it currently stands, this page reads like a press release; it's quite clear some PR flack has been all over it. Really vile. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.104.96.165 (talk) 11:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. On December 2, user Execintern1 pretty much rewrote the article from scratch. I suppose we can guess who they're an intern with. I've reverted their changes out. —Tim Pierce (talk) 19:34, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's peculiar there is no mention in this article of Ernie Boch Jr., the namesake who underwrote the organization. That should probably be corrected. jhawkinson (talk) 02:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]