Talk:Beneteau

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Sailing Mid‑importance Beneteau is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've been looking at other sailboat builder articles and have found that many have weasel words which are loaded phrases that are in violation of WP:NPOV. This article is well-done in general but seems too advertisement-biased in its wording for Wikipedia.Bradfordschultze 07:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bradford,

I agree that there are as you say "weasel words" with this and other articles, including recent articles about sailboat manufacturers. HOWEVER, please look at other examples of articles about manufacturing companies and see whether such exist across the board. I suggest auto manufacturers as an example. In the case of both the marine and automotive media, it seems that writers lose their objectivity in the reporting process; unfortunately periodicals are one of the few sources of third party information.

I have tried to present interesting material while removing fluff and overstatement. However since information is limited and Wikipedia has a strict policy prohibiting expressing opinions or presenting original research, we are stuck with an imperfect situation.

Also since Wikipedia is open to contributions from all commers, I've tried to strike a compromise with onther contributors in toning-down their enthusiastic comments without opening a polarized battle.

I value your observation and I've taken a another pass at weasel redcution in this article. Ironically, I'm not a Beneteau fan.

I think that tagging this article as "Advertising" is unwarranted and will only lead to knee-jerk reactions from unsophisticated power-hungry "Editors."

Thanks!

Kevin Murray 14:27, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The list in the Competitors and Past designers is rather long and doesn't seem worth including here, it's also repeated on the Hunter Marine, and most other boat builders' pages. Given that the other articles are in the Boat Builders category do we need this? Rich257 07:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The objective of putting the competitors at each manufacturers page is to offer a balanced point of view and avoid having the article be or appear to be an advertisment for the manufacturer. Clearly to someone looking at all of the article it would appar redundant, but otherwise this could be valuable and causes no harm.

Kevin Murray 20:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone evaluate [http:// cruisingresources.com/resources.php?pt=1&ss=beneteau+monohull Beneteau cruising models] as a suggested External Link? The suggsted link and its related pages contain succinct and detailed specifications and other information about all Beneteau cruising boats. The pages, which I compile, contain no commercial content. Dstookey 15:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to http:// cruisingresources.com/crs_about "Sponsors ... pay me for placement near the top of a Topic page", which I would take as being much like a commercial site. Please explain why you think your site has no commercial content. Rich257 16:00, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cruising Resources covers 294 subtopics of sailboat cruising, as well as over 1,500 cruising sailboat models. Of the 10,818 listings on the site, 88 of them have a paid-for preferential position (but not promotional wording). This sponsorship payment helps cover the costs of what is a hobby business, but CR is hardly a commercial site. The relatively few pages which I feel are topic-specific and information-dense enough to be useful to Wikipedia users (Beneteau, Gaff rig, etc.) do not contain sponsor listings, and I will not suggest the relatively few pages that do.

I notice that many External Links for sailing topics are fully commercial, and many others contain ads. I am interested in promoting my passion, sailboat cruising, through better coverage in Wikipedia and I shall be submitting a few additional draft articles on topics not yet covered (Beach Cruising, Crew in the boating sense, etc). If you feel that CR pages step over the line of commercialism, the listings on them may still be the best source for Wikipedia editors to use in identifying relevant external references that ARE acceptable. Dstookey 16:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are many other commercial links on Wikipedia, which is not right and they should also be removed. I profess no partial knowledge in the area of sailboat cruising. I think you did not help your case by adding links to many articles and by adding only links and no content, as spammers tend to do, which is part of the reason why I removed them all. It is always tricky when someone adds links to sites they have an interest in, hence the WP:COI guidelines. Rich257 23:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite right. Today was my first day with Wikipedia. I thought I understood the guidelines, but obviously did not. You set me straight, and I appreciate it. Is a "Could someone evaluate . . ." message in the Discussion section (e.g. above) the proper way to suggest a link?

Yes indeed, Wikipedia aims to work on concensus rather than a battle over who last edited the page. Rich257 20:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am creator of the sailboatdata.com. Some one has placed links from the various Idyll models (towards the end of the article) to my site. This is absolutely fine with me. Information such as this is the primary niche/specialty of my site.

I would also like to add/create similar links for all the other OUT OF PRODUCTION models, (so as not to be in conflict with the current manufacturer) and, in fact, would very much like to do so. But before I did so, I wanted to clearly state that I AM the owner of the site I am linking to and wanted to be sure that I wouldn't be violating any Wikipedia policy. Sailboatdata (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• BENETEAU LOGO 2018.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the top view pic of the two Beneteau yachts I made myself in 2004. I am a bit in doubt if these are really both Oceanis 411 (though of one I am pretty sure), as I do not have other good pics of these boats at hand, and the decks seem quite different in the front parts. Any ideas? Pittigrilli (talk) 20:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]