Talk:Battle of Fréteval

Battle of Fréteval has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 27, 2017. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Battle of Fréteval appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 July 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that after the 1194 Battle of Fréteval, Richard I captured the French King's government archive which travelled with him, who as a result founded the French National Archives in Paris? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Fréteval.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: British / European / French / Medieval This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force French military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Fréteval/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 13:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Extremely sorry for the delay. Will complete this soon. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Lead and infobox;
  • Please add an infobox to the article to increase the readability, you may use: {{Infobox military conflict}}

[1] applies.

• • Fix the link syntax here: Philip Augustus, from a twelth-century French manuscript in the Bibliotheque Nationale

Done, well spotted.

• Section 1;
  • For over a "an" year

Negative.

• • John had made Philip large grants from Richard's Duchy of Aquitaine; please rephrase to improve the readability

Good catch, done.

• • King Richard I of England; dup-link

Well, per MOS:DUPLINK there's no harm in a repetition for the first occurance following the lede, and if you want to removed the duplink to Rich, you presumable also want to rm the same to Philip. Either way, I'm easy.

• Section 2;
  • soaked through- 'a condition which delighted Richard'^[18]- after; use mdash

I agree it was a crappy sentence generally; If you don't mind, I've re-worded and tightened it.

• Section 3; all good
• 0% confidence, violation unlikely.

Well-written, sorry for the delay. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:19, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]