Talk:Artificial society

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Science This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Artificial Society → Artificial society

• Support - proper naming conventions. violet/riga (t) 19:56, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support. This will make inline linking more straightforeward. Jonathunder 00:34, 2005 Mar 4 (UTC)
• Support. Caps for proper nouns, only. --A D Monroe III 12:53, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Moved. violet/riga (t) 20:04, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Why? Here is why (also the reason for removal of the BFI entry from WP):

Readers should note that this article conceals the true nature of the Bandung Fe Institute (BFI). In particular, researchers in economics and social complexity should be warned that the Bandung Fe Institute is not officially recognized as a "research institution" in Indonesia and that it is run by three amateurs (the so-called "Board of Science" of the institute) who have not obtained their first academic degrees (they may well already be university drop-outs) and have had no adequate training or experience in conducting proper research. Readers can verify this fact for themselves by reading the brief biography of the three main "researchers" at the Bandung Fe Institute's official website: [1]. In fact, the "President" of the institute, one Hokky Situngkir, freely admits on his personal website ([2] and click on the link "Personal Academic Stance" on that page), at least up to the date of the writing of this talk page (August 12, 2007), that he did not complete his undegraduate education in Electrical Engineering, and attributes his personal failure to what he perceives to be "the emotional arrogance that is often found in our academic society" and "societal cosmetics of academic degrees." This attitude is also shared by the other two members of the "Board of Science" and they apparently have as their motto "if you are searching knowledge and science, do not go to school but to the library!," indicating their contempt for formal tertiary education. Members of the institute have posted numerous low-quality, trivial and/or often incomprehensible (due to their lack of mastery of English grammar and writing) papers on various relatively unregulated (i.e. not peer-reviewed) online repositories such RePEc [3] and Arxiv [4] covering topics in "economic physics" and social complexity. The academically trained readers can verify the level of competence of these researchers for themselves by examining any of these papers. Their idea of "research" is introducing a simple model, performing some numerical simulation and then making general qualitative conclusions based on the simulations without any in-depth or rigorous analysis. This is something which most serious researchers would consider to merely be material for a term paper assignment in some undergraduate modeling and simulation course, rather than true and useful research. Of course, this comes as no surprise due to the BFI members' inadequate training and lack of experience.

The Bandung Fe Institute publishes the "journal" entitled Journal of Social Complexity. This journal has as "Editors" and "Board of Editors" the same three amateurs that are on the "Board of Science." They are ultimately responsible for reviewing and approving papers for publication in this journal. Therefore, researchers with advanced academic degrees and years of research experience should think twice before submitting their scholarly works to be judged by inexperienced amateurs. It is strange that despite their contempt for academia, the members of the Bandung Fe Institute try to reach out to members of the international academic community to get recognition for their inadequate works.Erik incognito 00:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read also the following blog about the Bandung Fe Institute: [5]Erik incognito 02:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Erik incognito 08:28, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Artificial society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040915080903/http://www.brook.edu/es/dynamics/models/history.htm to http://www.brook.edu/ES/dynamics/models/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]