Talk:Archerfield Airport

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Airports This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the airport project. Australia: Brisbane / Queensland / Transport Low‑importance Archerfield Airport is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

There could be more information about how the Archerfield Airport Corporation has openly admitted they plan on subdividing the land that archerfield is on so that it can be leased or sold for more profit than the airfield can currently make. The corporation has also been known to raise rent prices so high for some companies that it is no longer financially viable to stay there. Landing fees have also steadily increased. --Spuzzdawg 07:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Archerrunway.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now that the airport is class D, certain procedures have changed. e.g. taxi calls are now required. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.186.73.103 (talk) 23:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

archerfield aeorodrome was thr first location/camp of the 8th fighter group headquarters squadron when it arrived in Australia. from there to antill plains northern qweensland then to milne bay papua .

the 419th signal company occupied the radio station in the woods where the radio mast is shown in some pictures. the 419th was the Brisbane station for the 5th air force communicating to new guinea both with radio and experimental radio teletype. an example of the experimental radio teletype is in the Australian military museum.

john s maidlow 8th fighter group/419th signal company — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.130.153 (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Archerfield Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120410232605/http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/aip/current/dap/BAFAD01-129.pdf to http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/aip/current/dap/BAFAD01-129.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I’d like to propose that the general aviation procedures section be removed. In my opinion the information within has little to no relevance to the general public and is only relevant to pilots who fly at Archerfield. Oliverok (talk) 08:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you about its relevance to readers. Plus it is uncited and may or may not be up-to-date. I think we want pilots thinking of using this airprot to get their information about this airport from reliable aviation sources for obvious safety reasons. I have removed the section. Kerry (talk) 04:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]