Talk:Assianism

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Neopaganism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Ossetia (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ossetia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OssetiaWikipedia:WikiProject OssetiaTemplate:WikiProject OssetiaOssetia articles Russia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ukraine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What do Ossetians have to do with Germanic mythology?
This article is about the modern pagan religion of the asi, right? Why then does the link lead to an article about Old Norse religion? 5.18.167.105 (talk) 20:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1]. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:46, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given that adherents of Assianism reject the term Pagan as insulting because of its negative connotations, is it not better to use a different description in the first line of this article? SanVitores (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article states that Uatsdin is polytheistic. However,some scholars which are cited in the article described Uatsdin to be monotheistic in nature. Given the fact that folk religions are often very heterogeneous in nature, shouldn't it be mentioned that monotheist forms might exist? Maybe the findings of Shnirelman, Schmitz and Foltz should be contrasted in these regards to give a more complete image. 2A01:599:905:ED24:26C9:8467:5347:F1CC (talk) 15:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]