Talk:Amsterdam Tournament

	Amsterdam Tournament is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 23, 2010 Featured list candidate Promoted

This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football: Netherlands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Dutch football task force (assessed as Low-importance). Netherlands This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please discuss the use of flags here rather than edit-warring. Once we have a consensus we can adjust the article accordingly. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article passed at FLC because it met these requirements and the usage of flags was not touched upon because it was correct. If the key had not been there then I'm sure it would have been suggested. I used the guidelines listed here when I expanded the article. It states that "The name of a flag's country (or province, etc.) should appear adjacent to the first use of the flag icon" and "Nearby uses of the flag need not repeat the name". The inclusion of a key before the tables prevented accessibility issues. If there is no key explaining what the flags mean then there shouldn't be any flags included.

Historical considerations are also covered. The Spanish flags used when Barcelona entered the competition in 1975 and 1977 are different to the one used when Athletic Bilbao participated in 1985, which is covered in the key. The same applies to Dynamo Kiev. The flag of Ukraine has no point being in the key because it isn't in the table. Dynamo last took part two years before the present-day Ukraine was formed. The only change I would agree with is using the flag of the Soviet Union instead of the Ukrainian SSR since the club competed in European football under it. I disagree entirely with sweeping changes to an article that passed at FLC and has been stable for three years because someone doesn't like it. Walls of Jericho (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the fact that Dynamo Kiev competed in the European Cup through a Soviet Union berth, much like the Welsh Swansea City taking an English berth in this season's Europa League, Dynamo were based in the Soviet Union and competed in their league system until the state's dissolution. Why isn't the flag of Catalonia next to Barcelona, instead of whichever carnation of the Spanish flag, for the sake of consistency?

Before changing my edits, at least use the correct Romania flag before mindlessly reverting, ta. VEO^onefive 03:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm agreeing with you regarding Dynamo but oh well. The Romanian flag was an honest error on my part. Walls of Jericho (talk) 19:16, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amsterdam Tournament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101204110742/http://english.ajax.nl/The-Club/The-club.htm to http://english.ajax.nl/The-Club/The-club.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amsterdam Tournament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090323080602/http://www.skysports.com/football/match_report/0%2C19764%2C11065_3011859%2C00.html to http://www.skysports.com/football/match_report/0%2C19764%2C11065_3011859%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]