Talk:Aletopelta

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dinosaurs Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by The Ankylosauria Task Force (assessed as Mid-importance). Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can one of the authors add a specific reference for the fossils recoverd from the Point Loma Formation to this article? The information given in the article on the Point Loma Formation is apparently incomplete based on this article but at least it is referenced. Jstuby (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References have now been added.--MWAK (talk) 09:03, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

is it still a nomen dubium? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samweithe4 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No idea, but a source like Arbour & Currie 2015 should bechecked. IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 14:40, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You mean it is no longer dubious? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samweithe4 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should the family Ankylosauridae be added under the classification table? On Ankylosauridae's page it shows that Aletopelta is a subgroup/genus of Ankkylosauridae, however this classification is missing for Aletopelta's page. Notyepeyton (talk) 21:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]