Talk:Afghanistanism

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Afghanistan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Sociology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It seems as though this term is an American one, judging by the origin of the references; perhaps this should be made more clear in the lede. Accounting4Taste:talk 17:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I found some more references from non-American sources (there is one already) and will add them soonest. The term may have been coined in America (I am not sure), but it is now used elsewhere. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 21:23, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it is necessary to cite a national origin for this term: I would be surprised if it is not recognized universally by now, at least among journalists, and maybe some academicians. But if you can find a good source, instead of simply making an extrapolation from those we have, by all means go ahead and use it. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 05:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a lot of help, but I am sure a long time ago I read a late Victorian novel, where mother is giving advice to her daughter about going out into society. She tells her daughter that she can always get her male companion to start a conversation (or more likely a monologue) by saying ".... and isn't it dreadful about Afghanistan?". Because it always was. I will try to find the source for this.Thomas Peardew (talk) 14:54, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering whether this word is best served by a wikipedia article or if it might be better situated at wiktionary per WP:DICTIONARY. There are four or five competing definitions of the term here and I'm not really seeing an article. Gobonobo ^{T C} 00:11, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem of Afghanistanism was deemed serious enough to be mentioned in journalism textbooks in the 1970s and 1980, so it deserves its own article as a look back at those years if nothing else. It could be put in Wiktionary, too. At some point in the future (maybe even now) the phenomenon will be researched by folks (journalism historians maybe?) who don't know how much ink it got in days past and would like to know more about it.. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:50, 27 September 2010 (UTC) The article treats Afghanistanism as a concept, not as a word. GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there is no question that the term has been in use and in a variety of contexts. I took a stab at a wiktionary entry for Afghanistanism and thought that the connection to environmentalism was tenuous based on the references. The second source only offered environmentalism as an example of Afghanistanism and could easily have been any other localized phenomenon. Wikipedia articles should cover one topic, while this article says that Afghanistanism can mean either "hopelessly arcane and irrelevant scholarship" or "fascination with exotic, faraway lands," or "railing and shaking your fist at an unseen foe." Perhaps this page would work better as a disambiguation for the differing meanings? Gobonobo ^{T C} 08:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is (or better, it was) a concept with many applications, and like a great number of concepts, commentators could be divided as to its meaning and scope. Sincerely, your friend, GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Afghanistanism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124115625/http://globaljournalist.org/columns/final-word/2001/12/01/afghanistanism-comes-home/ to http://www.globaljournalist.org/columns/final-word/2001/12/01/afghanistanism-comes-home/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nigerdeltacongress.com/particles/pseudoafghanistanism.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://colorsnw.com/colors/tag/afghanistanism/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://mjfellows.org/media/journal/winter01/eisendrath.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Afghanistanism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nigerdeltacongress.com/particles/pseudoafghanistanism.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708103701/http://blogs.buffalonews.com/opinion/2009/10/afghanistanism.html to http://blogs.buffalonews.com/opinion/2009/10/afghanistanism.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]