[go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

Talk:Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blackface controversy

[edit]

On 26th of June, Netflix pulled the episode from their streaming service due to the use of blackface. Reference: https://www.thewrap.com/community-advanced-dungeons-and-dragons-episode-removed-netflix-blackface/ I'm not sure where to put this information.

Wow, that's unfortunate... he's supposed to be a dark elf. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
They seem to have put it back on Peacock 203.5.70.152 (talk) 10:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I do see that they have it: [1] Can anyone find a source to see when it was added to Peacock? BOZ (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find one a couple of months ago. It's worth noting that there's no unified "they" in the sentence above: Netflix and Hulu removed the episode and Peacock is a different company. The episode continued to be available through some companies in some regions, not to mention DVDs, so this was never a lost episode, and there are far too many (unverifiable) platform moves the show has experienced since 2011 to list here. — Bilorv (talk) 08:22, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for looking into that. :) BOZ (talk) 12:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 18:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • The phrase "games creator Dan Harmon" makes it sound like he made D&D - try rewording.
  • Is there a reason it can't be mentioned it was Chang (Ken Jeong) wearing blackface?

Plot

[edit]
  • This section is 371 words (361 without actor names), so that passes WP:TVPLOT.
  • "feigns an interest" should be "feigns interest"

Production

[edit]
  • "He also" → "Harmon also" (to avoid confusion with previous sentence)
  • With the comment above, change the next sentence to "He credited".
  • Add a year date for Saving Private Ryan.
  • Same thing for The Fellowship of the Ring.

Reception

[edit]
  • This section looks good.

Removal from streaming services

[edit]
  • No issues here.

References

[edit]

Some Dude From North Carolina: All items have been addressed except for the years in parentheses – I haven't seen that in many other TV articles. Do you have a link to that policy? Otherwise, I'm inclined to leave them out; they disrupt the lines without adding any necessary information (in my opinion). RunningTiger123 (talk) 22:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RunningTiger123: Though optional, I thought it would be better to have consistency with other GA-articles mentioning year-dates from Community, including "Paradigms of Human Memory", "Pilot", "Regional Holiday Music", and "Remedial Chaos Theory". Anyway, since it is optional, I'll pass the article as all my other suggestions have been addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 13:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Improved to Good Article status by RunningTiger123 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article was promoted to GA on 19 April, long enough, referenced, neutral and no copyvio-obvious. Earwig picked up this but it's probably them copying from the article. The hooks are referenced and interesting. The image used the article is free. QPQ done. Corachow (talk) 19:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Advanced_Dungeons_%26_Dragons_(Community)&oldid=1226724686"