Talk:Acclaimed Music

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This page should not be speedily deleted because... plenty of sources --— goethean 00:24, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Acclaimed Music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140213121057/http://www.acclaimedmusic.net/Current/q_and_a.htm to http://www.acclaimedmusic.net/Current/q_and_a.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130821062222/http://www.acclaimedmusic.net/Current/top_3000_albums_130621.xls to http://www.acclaimedmusic.net/Current/top_3000_albums_130621.xls
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130821065312/http://www.acclaimedmusic.net/Current/top_3000_songs_130621.xls to http://www.acclaimedmusic.net/Current/top_3000_songs_130621.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems worth noting here that Acclaimed Music is no longer considered reliable as of 2022 (WP:NOTRSMUSIC). Gene Stanley1 (talk) 06:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Thanks for helping to remove this as a source. CAVincent (talk) 09:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Surprised this was a year after its respective discussion but better late than never, I guess. Carlinal (talk) 11:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]