Talk:AGESA

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Okay, what does world+dog want to see on this topic, what is needed. I am a non-NDA Agesa reverse engineering expert Twobombs (talk) 10:08, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

nda or not, most components are considered trade secrets and thus not allowed on wikipedia but anything that is general knowledge is okay. Markthemac (talk) 02:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An insight into the bizarre numbering system would be useful. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 16:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just wrote a bit in an attempt to shed some light on that. It took me a while but I finally made some sense out of it. --uKER (talk) 02:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

seems to be open sourcecode in coreboot. Whats happened here? Would be good to expand. 188.220.243.64 (talk) 21:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I read about the release of AMD Combo PI version 1.0.0.4 Patch B (SMU v46.54)^[1]. Should this be added to the article. Because of this, I'm also confused by the version numbering. Because the version is now again a 1.0.0.4 version, while there were already 1.0.0.6 versions. Jan Vlug (talk) 12:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AMD always resets the version numbers for the different AGESA iterations, currently its Combo-PI and previous version was Pinnacle-PI. --Denniss (talk) 13:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]