Talk:2009 WWE Draft

	2009 WWE Draft is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 10, 2009 Featured list candidate Promoted
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 3, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 2009 World Wrestling Entertainment Draft featured seven selections that affected seven of the company's nine championships?

This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Professional wrestling Low‑importance 2009 WWE Draft is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Could you please get rid of those things? They just mess it up and make it look ugly and it's too much info to fit into such a tiny space. There's no real need for this article to be going into real names, is there?76.226.105.212 (talk) 05:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes because its about the employees being drafted, not the characters.--Truco 21:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is the draft random or do the GM's manually pick?

It was random.--Truco 01:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was on The WWE Universe Chat room when it was on and officials from WWE who were running the chat said that the GMs picked —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.197.126 (talk) 18:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's old, but if it's ok to add another supplemental draft since some wrestlers have been moved to other brands? The reason why because after Raw was ("kayfable") bought by Donald Trump, he and the other GMs decided to do another draft under Vince McMahon's nose, and after Vince bought back Raw from Trump, he annouced to the viewers that another draft took place and he had to obey it. (Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

That was not a Draft that was a trade not another draft there for it wont be added.--Dcheagle (talk) 04:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exacttly what User:Dcheagle said, it wasn't a draft or a supplemental draft. It was a trade completely unrelated to the draft, so should not be included in this article. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2009 WWE draft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090218215033/http://gerweck.net:80/ratings.htm to http://www.gerweck.net/ratings.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2009 WWE draft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090222083506/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2002/2002_03_27.jsp to http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2002/2002_03_27.jsp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090222051450/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2006/2006_05_25_02.jsp to http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2006/2006_05_25_02.jsp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gerweck.net/ratings.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2009 WWE draft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090420233527/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2005/2005_06_29.jsp to http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2005/2005_06_29.jsp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628183320/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/entertainment/2008840912_apcablenielsens.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/entertainment/2008840912_apcablenielsens.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]