[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:2007 Copa Sudamericana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

D.C. United

[edit]

Why is D.C. United CONCACAF Champions' Cup 2007 Third Place?

The only mention of this I can find is are [1]. It is also noted here [2]. Looks like DC made it through thanks to beating Olimpia in the Champions Cup quarter final and putting up a good fight against Guadalajara.--Fridge46 22:38, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rearrangement of the article

[edit]

I have rearrange the article into a more detailed one, please help to do the same thing in other edition of the competition. Raymond Giggs 07:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That took a while but its done or at least I'm hoping it is since I don't know some of the Templates for Quarter final bracket. BrujoOwns 16:44, September 25 2007 (UTC)

Create a bracket

[edit]

The bracket used is for the Champions League, so therefore the final doesn't have two legs. I was searching for a bracket that uses 2-legged finals and has no seeds but couldn't find one, because we can't use this one Template:Round16-2legs. Anyone familiar with creating templates and could make one with no seeds and a 2-legged final? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MicroX (talkcontribs) 23:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, just changed the bracket to a new template. Please let me know if there are any problems with it, I just adapted Template:16TeamBracket-2Leg. The same can be done with Template:Round16-2legs if people feel that it gets too cluttered with the aggregate score. --Gabbec (talk) 05:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Football box inclusion

[edit]

We should start to include the football boxes for the knock-out round now. --MicroX 23:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds Good -Brujoowns 00:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The image File:Copa sudamericana.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --17:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:35, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2007 Copa Sudamericana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]