Talk:1 November 1944 reconnaissance sortie over Japan

	1 November 1944 reconnaissance sortie over Japan has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 5, 2016 Good article nominee Listed
	Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 1, 2019, November 1, 2023, and November 1, 2024.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Japan: Military history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 14:09, November 6, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force. WikiProject Japan to do list: edit history watch purge Peer review: None A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles Military history: Aviation / Asian / Japanese / North America / United States / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Asian military history task force Japanese military history task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force United States: Military history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

This review is transcluded from Talk:1 November 1944 reconnaissance sortie over Japan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 05:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this one, comments to follow. Zawed (talk) 05:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

• "...plan many Air raids on Japan...": lower case a for Air.
  • Fixed 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Background

• wikilink USAAF and recite it in full on first usage as the abbreviation is used later in the article)
  • Done Nick-D (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo reconnaissance sortie

• wikilink California, Oahu, Kwajalein, Brigadier General, 47th Sentai? If no link for the latter, maybe a note to explain what it is - I assume a squadron or wing?
  • I think California would be over-linking given the relevant location there is linked, but I've linked the others.
• "...American airmen took 7000..."; for consistency with the presentation of numbers in the rest of the article, shouldn't it be 7,000?
  • Done Nick-D (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other stuff

• Consider, for sake of presentation, putting the notes into columns (suggestion only).
  • Done Nick-D (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider putting an image in? There is one of a F-13 on the B29 page.
  • Done. I couldn't find a good and clearly PD one though! Nick-D (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, this article reads well, is fully cited and neutral in tone, and has reasonable coverage of the subject. I will check back on progress in a few days. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 06:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the review - I'll follow up on your comments tomorrow or over the weekend Nick-D (talk) 10:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that I've now responded to all your comments. Nick-D (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, looks good Nick, passing as a GA now. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again Nick-D (talk) 09:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]