Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Emnx (2nd)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Emnx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
SKRINE2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Coldmachine (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Evidence
Emnx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) was recently blocked for 1 month for sockpuppetry as confirmed by checkuser. This was a set of single-purpose accounts and dynamic IPs concerned only with Mandrake Press (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Mandrake of Oxford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Emnx previously prodded Mandrake of Oxford. Now, following the block of Emnx, a new single-purpose account is created whose first edit is to nominate Mandrake of Oxford for deletion. There is reason to believe that this editor has a conflict of interest over Mandrake Press and views Mandrake of Oxford as "a competitor". See previous sockpuppet report for more details.
User uses exactly the same language ("seems to be based on commercial-minded exposure/advertising") in the AfD as previously used by Coldmachine (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) in two edit comments: 1, 2
- I tried to nominate Mandrake of Oxford for deletion but in order to do so I found I had to create an account (which I did). As part of my research (in order to support the proposal for deletion) I looked at the history of the article. I found the article had been nominated recently by Coldmachine. I simply copied his descriptive text, as it was a valid opinion by another editor — I thought it would help build consensus if the reasons given had already been perceived and explained by others. Can somebody please explain what have I done wrong? --SKRINE2 08:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- Conclusions
- User:SKRINE2 is a fairly obvious sockpuppet, having been created immediately after User:Emnx was blocked and immediately taking up the cause of deleting Mandrake of Oxford. Thus, SKRINE2 has been blocked indefinitely. The block on Emnx has been extended to 3 months for ongoing violations of WP:SOCK. I don't see convincing evidence regarding User:Coldmachine to conclude that he/she is a sockpuppet; the account's been around for awhile and edits a variety of topics. If there is further concern, checkuser may be appropriate. MastCell Talk 15:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]