Wikipedia:Peer review/Alpine pika/archive1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because trying to take it to an FA status!

Thanks, Adityavagarwal (talk) 05:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC), TheSandDoctor and User:7&6=thirteen[reply]

As mentioned at the end of the GA page, it would be good to get missing papers found through Google scholar before FAC, if this hasn't already been done. FunkMonk (talk) 15:00, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, onto it, FunkMonk! Adityavagarwal (talk) 18:29, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]