Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Alia Bhatt filmography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Alia Bhatt filmography

Featured list candidates/Alia Bhatt filmography/archive1

Nominator(s): Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stepping into the FLC space after very many years with the filmography page of actress Alia Bhatt. Looking forward to some constructive comments. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dank

Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
Welcome back to FLC! You've done a really good job over the years with actress articles (including lists). I think there's a misconception among some editors that leads like this one are easy to write ... they're not, because you have to weigh sources (most of which have promotional intent, or even promotional content) and make very fine judgments about exactly what you can and can't say in Wikipedia's "voice". Unfortunately, I don't have the skill set to make those judgments. Fortunately, I can get a large chunk of the reviewing work done here, and maybe that will help out the other reviewers.
For ref #27, I can't tell if the first link is broken or not.
Checking the FLC criteria:
1. I found nothing to copyedit (apart from adding captions to all 3 tables). I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the table. (Some might object to sorting "Safina Firdausi" under S, but I think it's an acceptable judgment call, because so many of the roles are known only by a first name.)
- Note that Chris disagrees below ... that's fine, go with his advice on this. - Dank (push to talk) 16:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, but this isn't a source review. A lot of work has gone into improving the UPSD tool over the years; it's marking four citations in yellow, indicating "it depends on how the source is being used", but none of those four are problematic ... they support the given text. All relevant retrieval dates are present.
3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
4. It is navigable.
5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the one image seem fine. The licensing is a little complicated but it works for me.
6. It may or may not be "stable", looking at the edit history; time will tell. I'll give it a pass for now.
Close enough for a support. Well done.
Speaking of being promotional, I'll shamelessly promote my latest lists here: List of early-diverging flowering plant families or ~~List of basal superasterid families or~~ (whenever I can nominate it) List of nitrogen-fixing-clade families. Reviewers needed! - Dank (push to talk) 15:31, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the review, Dank. I have replaced ref 27 with a different one anyway. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

My only comment is that where the character she played has a surname, it should sort based on that rather than the forename -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:09, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:09, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Chris! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - the prose is excellent. My only suggestions are to link ref. publishers consistently and replace/remove International Business Times as it has been marked as unreliable by WP:RSP. FrB.TG (talk) 17:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and I've made the changes. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --Pres N 13:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.