Wikipedia:Editor review/Backslash Forwardslash

Backslash Forwardslash (talk · contribs) I have been at Wikipedia for quite a while now, and it has been a month or two since my unsuccessful RfA. I'm not rerunning any time soon, but I found the feedback so valuable during the RfA that I thought I'd stick my hand up for more constructive criticism. I, unfortunately, haven't had enough time for too much article writing as of late, and it is an area I desperately want to return to. I have started to pay more attention to the New Userpage log - it is quite staggering to see the rubbish that can sneak through. ∗ \ / (⁂) 09:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

• Hello, Backslash, you're a great addition to Wikipedia. Like you stated, I recommend you return to article editing, as I see a lot of script-related-work being done (which is greatly appreciated). I also recommend exposing yourself to other areas of WP, like WP:RFA, WP:XFD, or even here at WP:ER. You also seem to know how to deal with conflicts, a great admin quality. Hopefully in the near future, you can have a successful run at it.--Truco 22:30, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• View this user's edit count using X!'s Counter tool

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   The achievement I am most proud of here at Wikipedia is getting Bruce Kingsbury to FA status. It is my featured article that I have contributed to, and was also the first article I had to build from pretty much nothing. I'm also pretty happy with getting Australia Day to GA status, just before the 26th.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   Aside for a DYK flare-up that is pretty much history now, I haven't experienced too much stress while editing. ∗ \ / (⁂) 09:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]