Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Berg (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Berg (disambiguation)

Delete unnecessary page per MOS:DAB, already a hatnote on primary to only other entry, so this serves no purpose. Boleyn3 (talk) 17:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom highly unnecessary. JBsupreme (talk) 18:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The issue of "primary use" is highly subjective here (the term is not even explicitly defined in Wikipedia policy) - I claim that there is no predominant use of the name - complete disambiguation would be a more prudent way to go than an arbitrary assignment of so-called "primary use." In addition, redundancy is not a valid reason for deletion. The better choice is to make Elizabeth Berg the dab and Elizabeth Berg (disambiguation) a redirect to it instead. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 20:30, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment a primary is usually judged on page views, plus a few other factors. Putting dab at primary page would mean that if you are looking for either, you need to go through two clicks and are delayed; at the moment, that isn't the case. This page clearly doesn't meet MOS:DAB; in fact it meets the criteria for a speedy, with {db-disambig}. Boleyn3 (talk) 23:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.